Jump to content
NotebookTalk

1610ftw

Member
  • Posts

    1,212
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

1610ftw last won the day on February 9 2023

1610ftw had the most liked content!

3 Followers

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

1610ftw's Achievements

Mentor

Mentor (12/14)

  • One Year In
  • Posting Machine Rare
  • Very Popular Rare
  • One Month Later
  • Conversation Starter

Recent Badges

919

Reputation

  1. Wow - too bad! I think it would be better for the forum to keep the posts and replace the user name with deleted user or something like that.
  2. Did you try limiting max power uptake? That could help with the 275HX. Hopefully undervolting will be available soon - the 13th and 14th gen needed it more but it should still save you up to 10% power on the CPU and either allow you to run cooler or with more performance. Agreed, also all his other posts are gone like in this thread. @Reciever can you elaborate on why we cannot see any of the posts of SACBomber any more? I would have thought that as soon as somebody posts here he would agree for his posts and threads to stay even when he leaves but apparently this isn't the case?
  3. @grisevg I think you are referring to this: Looks like there are different versions of the QTJ1 with one significantly worse than the other but I guess it is hard to exactly know what one is getting as all of them are after market modifications. How is your turbo and non turbo clock speed and can you unlock it and get higher turbo clocks? If this is a 10980HK it should have no problem going up to 5.0 GHz all cores and 5.1 GHz single core although for your chassis something like 4.4 to 4.8 GHz all core sounds more reasonable. In any case if those were "real" 10980HK the memory speeds would be a lot higher so that points to these being engineering samples which should also show up in significantly lower turbo and base clock speeds.
  4. Sorry, somehow did not see this post. Looks like yours did not have PTM7950 then! Haha, taking off the heatsink can be bad as you have to not only take off the screws for CPU and GPU but also for the fans 🙂 Have you tried to play around with the Clevo Control Center fan settings? Usually you can use it to tame the fans to a degree although you have to keep an eye on temps. I usually like to have a curve that keeps noise in check up to ca. 80C on the CPU and 70C on the GPU but with a unified heat sink is it more difficult to allow the CPU to get hotter than the GPU, especially when both are under load.
  5. Did you get the X580? Looks like the SACbomber account is gone - that is unusual!
  6. Cannot currently be undervolted but from what I have gathered undervolting would not help you that much. In the thread about the new MSI Titan @SACbomber reported between -30 and -50mV which is pretty low so you would get much less of a performance bump via undervolting compared to last gen CPUs that for me were all undervolting in excess of -100mV.
  7. The SSDs will heat up the motherboard to some degree and I have long wondered how much of an issue that would be. MSI and Clevo used to have their own self contained area with an array of up to 3 NVME SSDs some time ago but since then I have only seen the provision for cooling pads that connect to the mainboard. Does that mean it is safe? I would be a little bit sceptical if we are talking about writing terabytes to an SSD regularly but for everyday use it is probably fine. As a rule of thumb I try to avoid temperatures above 75C when transferring big amounts of data while shooting for regular temps in the low 60s or preferably less - quite high but such can be the realities in laptops. You can get HD Sentinel to check temps for yourself in the task bar and other parameters, too. It also warns you of possible failures. I have used the family license for years and highly recommend it, a test version is provided for free: Hard Disk Sentinel - HDD health and temperature monitoring
  8. Yes, saw that too, pathetic. The pictures also tell the story of a rather bad Tongfang imitation with a cheap looking case. Severe lack of judgement on behalf of Medion coupled with a price that does not at all reflect the subpar performance.
  9. Well, this has hundreds of posts, got a link?
  10. Which main thread are you talking about?
  11. I do not think that I misunderstood. My point was that in stock condition and as intended the x170 is the better laptop due to a number of factors with one very important one being the demise of SLI. Can the P870 be made better with a lot of effort and specialized knowledge? Clearly it can but that does not negate my point about the X170 being a better overall laptop in stock condition. As the P870 already has a thread where this is discussed I suggest we take this discussion there as I think that what you are doing with the P870 chassis is pretty cool.
  12. That has some crazy potential with a 980W power supply and water cooling but it has to have a bigger screen and a proper keyboard. No idea who gave input on this but with a QHD+ 18" and a proper full keyboard with numpad it would be a much more tempting option. I can understand that they may want to have a mousepad in there and possibly it is difficult to place it in front of the keyboard or it would increase height but in my opinion that is not necessary for what is really a mobile desktop. When you always need a power outlet you should also be able to bring a mouse even if the trackpad cannot be moved down in front of the keyboard. Oh and I wonder about their battery option - would be nice to at least have some one or two hours of battery life and it would probably help with sales.
  13. It is very impressive that for high performance laptops Uniwill / Tongfang are leading the way in several areas: modularity cooling bios customizeability thanks to working with Prema Intel and AMD option for the CPU To be fair to Clevo they are not exceptionally bad with regard to modularity but they have fallen in line with everybody else and they are still not back at the top when it comes to cooling capacity. Luckily the combination of improved cooling over last gen and a CPU that needs less power will give a lot better results but the 330W power supply already shows that they are not that serious about performance.
  14. Not sure what the argument is here. Clearly an desktop GPU board would only fit in the P870 but for using it as is the X170 is a better laptop because the added capability of the P870 to use a second GPU is not of much use any more and does not outweigh the keyboard, sound and lesser CPU cooling. In any case what is holding the P870 back the most is by now the CPU unless maybe you manage to put a 5080 in there for 4K gaming where frame rates will be affected the least.
  15. The P870 is a better desktop but it had issues cooling the 9th gen CPUs. The X170 was the better laptop except for the stupid dual power supply construction: much better sound better keyboard better fans unified heatsink I would also have preferred to see those improvements in a slightly bigger chassis with even better cooling but Clevo probably thought it would be overkill. Looking at the size of 5080 and 5090 desktop cards minus the cooler it is indeed a shame that nobody puts them in a laptop. We know it is possible to cool up to 400W of GPU in a laptop as has been shown by SLI designs from Clevo and MSI.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Terms of Use