Maro97
-
Posts
367 -
Joined
-
Last visited
4 Followers
.thumb.png.362386d2804d5f9fbcf2ec7f5aa009c5.png)
Maro97's Achievements
-
The image changed to look like this after I installed the graphics card driver in Windows.
-
Hello everyone The laptop suddenly loses power while I’m playing games, as if I had unplugged the charger from the laptop while the battery is not installed. What could be causing this problem?
-
clevo p870tm/tm1-g Official Clevo P870TM-G Thread
Maro97 replied to ViktorV's topic in Sager & Clevo
It’s worked 😁
-
clevo p870tm/tm1-g Official Clevo P870TM-G Thread
Maro97 replied to ViktorV's topic in Sager & Clevo
Does anyone know if old MXM 3.0b graphics cards work on Clevo P870TM systems, specifically Maxwell architecture cards ? Only for testing the mxm slot to see the data on laptop screen
-
Does anyone know if old MXM 3.0b graphics cards work on Clevo P870TM systems, specifically Maxwell architecture cards ? Only for testing the mxm slot to see the data on laptop screen
-
clevo p870tm/tm1-g Official Clevo P870TM-G Thread
Maro97 replied to ViktorV's topic in Sager & Clevo
What’s the RAM speed ? And does the 128GB of RAM work with a graphics card other than the RTX 3080? -
clevo p870tm/tm1-g Official Clevo P870TM-G Thread
Maro97 replied to ViktorV's topic in Sager & Clevo
Do you have P870TM ? -
P870tm 9900kf OC 4.9 ghz all cores UV -60 & rtx 3080 & 32gb ram (2x16) ballistix 1.35v XMP CL16 with air cooling system & 1440p 400nits 165hz not G-sync
-
75°C. Unfortunately, there is still no heatsink comparable to the vapor chamber. In my system, the temperature doesn’t exceed 63°C without liquid metal . I’m only using Thermal Grizzly Duronaut, not the newer Duronaut Pro.
-
There isn’t a big difference in performance between the 9900K and 9900KS. Even running at 5.0 GHz, 5.1 GHz, 5.2 GHz, or 5.3 GHz on all cores, the performance difference isn’t significant. At most, you’re looking at around 5–10 FPS on average, and that’s only if you can keep the temperatures under control with air cooling. With a closed-loop liquid cooler (AIO), the thermal situation may improve, allowing you to push the CPU further. However, you still won’t gain more than around 12–14 FPS at most.
-
Yes, I would consider a 9900K running 5.2 GHz all-core at 1.37V fixed Vcore with AVX2 -2 to be a very good chip, definitely above average and potentially a golden sample/top-binned chip. However, the exact bin quality also depends on stability and the test workload, since some chips can pass light benchmarks at that voltage but need more voltage under heavy AVX2 loads. As for where to find one, unfortunately there’s no reliable way to know beforehand. It’s basically silicon lottery. The best option is to find a seller who can provide actual CPU-Z/HWiNFO screenshots and, ideally, proof of stability at 5.2 GHz / 1.37V. If I come across a properly tested 9900K with these characteristics, I’ll let you know.
-
The vapor chamber heatsink with the adapters was great for cooling but rtx 3080 with new nvidia drivers at 150w don’t need it … In addition, whenever I need to access the CPU to replace the thermal paste, change the thermal pads, or replace the CPU itself, I have to remove the vapor chamber heatsink first. This has become very inconvenient, time-consuming, and completely unnecessary.
-
Could you please insert a photo for thermals from GPUZ ?
-
My friend, all of this depends on the silicon lottery, regardless of the CPU model. Low voltage at high frequencies is purely a matter of silicon lottery, no matter what.
-
Yes.. it should be
