astrohip Posted Friday at 11:21 PM Author Share Posted Friday at 11:21 PM Just pulled the trigger on a Thinkpad P16 Gen 2. Should be here in about two weeks. I appreciate everyone's feedback and help on this! 1 1 XPS 17, 64GB RAM, 2 4TB SSD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1610ftw Posted Saturday at 12:25 AM Share Posted Saturday at 12:25 AM Solid choice - let us know how you like it! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bullit Posted Sunday at 01:39 AM Share Posted Sunday at 01:39 AM On 3/4/2025 at 11:06 PM, astrohip said: I'm also looking at a Lenovo Thinkpad P16 Gen 2. I customized it to: i9 13950HX 64GB DDR5 (2) 4 TB SSD M.2 2280 PCIe Gen4 Opal 16" WQUXGA OLED touch, etc etc Nvidia RTX 2000 The rest is pretty much std. Thoughts? Is this a good laptop? Is there anything else in the Lenovo line I should be looking at? My criticism of this is the CPU and GPU. The CPU is overpower for chassis - i don't think any laptop can exploit the performance of an I-9. RTX2000 has generally the performance of a RTX3060 with 8GB VRAM instead of 6GB. For your use it seems non justifiable. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bullit Posted Sunday at 01:39 AM Share Posted Sunday at 01:39 AM Duplicated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
astrohip Posted Sunday at 09:46 PM Author Share Posted Sunday at 09:46 PM 20 hours ago, Bullit said: My criticism of this is the CPU and GPU. The CPU is overpower for chassis - i don't think any laptop can exploit the performance of an I-9. RTX2000 has generally the performance of a RTX3060 with 8GB VRAM instead of 6GB. For your use it seems non justifiable. You're almost certainly correct. In reality, the entire laptop is probably overkill. But I like a really fast machine, with lots of RAM, and blazing hard drive speed (and space) to spare. I don't have many vices in life, but a supersonic laptop is one. 1 XPS 17, 64GB RAM, 2 4TB SSD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1610ftw Posted 9 hours ago Share Posted 9 hours ago On 3/9/2025 at 2:39 AM, Bullit said: My criticism of this is the CPU and GPU. The CPU is overpower for chassis - i don't think any laptop can exploit the performance of an I-9. RTX2000 has generally the performance of a RTX3060 with 8GB VRAM instead of 6GB. For your use it seems non justifiable. The CPU is great as he can always run it at lower clock speeds where he will need a lot less power and the GPU will be chugging along. It gives him a nice vapor chamber heatsink and great cooling for his mostly CPU focused use case that obviously includes some degree of multitasking for which it is nice to have lots of cores and it is not like he could save a lot of money while getting the same cooling by going with a lesser CPU/GPU combo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bullit Posted 8 hours ago Share Posted 8 hours ago The lower clock do not prevent more heat from being a high performance CPU. Maybe the OP have an use case that i-9 would be necessary. If not he will only have laptop with fans working longer or always. That said I am curious about astrochip review. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
astrohip Posted 7 hours ago Author Share Posted 7 hours ago I will post a review when it arrives. I got excited, I rec'd a shipping notice. But then I saw it was for the extra power cord/brick. Still no ship date on the laptop itself, although I expect it will not be long. Use case for an i9? Debatable. But I do a few things that probably take all the CPU I can get, even if it's just for a few seconds. And if it speeds it up by a few split seconds, I'll take it. Much of what I do is also dependent on disk speed, hence my desire for fast SSDs. Sometimes I load 30,000 MP3+ files into a tagger (Mp3tag), all at once. I'm probably using everything the system has--disk, CPU, RAM. Or I might filter a Quicken report from 200MB of data (250,000+ transactions). Convert video and audio files from format to format. And on and on. Speed helps! But I'm not doing anything like some people, with graphics intensive programs, whether games or 3D modeling. Or huge multi-GB databases. I respect they truly need speed. XPS 17, 64GB RAM, 2 4TB SSD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1610ftw Posted 5 hours ago Share Posted 5 hours ago 1 hour ago, Bullit said: The lower clock do not prevent more heat from being a high performance CPU. Maybe the OP have an use case that i-9 would be necessary. If not he will only have laptop with fans working longer or always. That said I am curious about astrochip review. Lower clocks result in lower power consumption and at some point we have a 125W CPU that can be handled quite well by the cooling solution provided by Lenovo. Of course you are right that one should make some use of a specific CPU or else save the money and from what @astrohip says he has such a use case where he can complete some of the stuff he does faster while also being able to do other things on the side. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
astrohip Posted 3 hours ago Author Share Posted 3 hours ago Shipped! On that slow boat from China... XPS 17, 64GB RAM, 2 4TB SSD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now