Jump to content
NotebookTalk

Dell Precision 7670 & Dell Precision 7770 owner's thread


Recommended Posts

19 minutes ago, TwistedAndy said:

There's some heat transfer from CPU to GPU and vice-versa

if you put the numbers in place "some" becomes 50%, in most stress test i conducted i focused on CPU only,
during these tests GPU hot spot was 10 degrees hotter than CPU stress temps while doing nothing,

the impossible is not impossible, its just haven't been done yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, TwistedAndy said:

From my perspective, the heatsink in 7670/7770 might be better, but it's not that bad. I think, it would be better to implement a thicker version of the heatsink from Precision 5770 / XPS 17 with two fans on each side, but I'm not a thermal engineer and don't know all the details.

 

The best I have seen from Dell was the Alienware 51m R2 which had an optional CPU side vapor chamber. It could easily handle higher CPU loads at lower noise as it prioritized cooling over weight and size. Even better you could purchase a binned processor from eBay or silicon lottery to overcome the issue of getting a bad BGA CPU (and keep the good one if a mobo replacement were needed). Such a machine probably was never destined to become a Precision though, as most mobile workstation users want something portable even as a DTR.

  • Thumb Up 1

Desktop - 12900KS, 32GB DDR5-6400 C32, 2TB WD SN850, Windows 10 Pro 22H2

Clevo X170SM - 10900K, 32GB DDR4-2933 CL17, 4TB WD SN850X, RTX 3080 mobile, 17.3 inch FHD 144hz, System76 open source firmware, Windows 10 Pro 22H2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Audio driver update 6.0.9394.1.

https://www.dell.com/support/home/en-us/drivers/driversdetails?driverid=44RR8

- Fixed the issue where there is no sound from the Dell Slim Soundbar SB521A when the system is in Battery mode.

 

On the subject of the audio driver, I fought with that a bit over the past few days in both Precision 7560 and 7770.

 

You need Dell Optimizer installed in order for certain audio functions to work, like being able to specify if you plugged in headphones or a headset to the 3.5mm jack (required to activate the microphone input on that jack).  Also, without Optimizer installed, you can get "pop" sounds when sounds like alerts start or stop.  It's like the sound chip "sleeps" while its not doing anything and then pops while it is changing power states.  (This has been an issue with the Precision line since M4800/M6800, when they switched to using the Realtek sound chip.)  This doesn't happen with Optimizer installed.

 

I have found that Dell Optimizer activates certain "enhancements" for conference calling type apps (MS Teams, Webex, Zoom, etc.).  I don't like them, it makes people's voices sound echo-y and weird.  You can disable the enhancements in the Optimizer app, but then everything in my work conference app (Webex) is super quiet compared to other sounds on the system, so there is still some kind of filter in place even with everything audio-related in Dell Optimizer turned off.  That in turn can be fixed by going to the "Sound control panel" in Windows and just disabling "audio enhancements" for the output sound device.  Everything will then sound "normal" and at the appropriate volume level.

 

However, I'm using another third-party audio filter to apply a simple -20dB filter to my headphones output.  The default headphones output sound is way too loud.  I have to run with the Windows volume set to "4" or "6", which means granular control of the volume level using the keyboard is not possible.  (Windows changes it in increments of "2", so there are only a few settings to choose from in a reasonable volume range, often I have to decide between "a little too quiet" and "a little too loud".)  With the -20dB filter in place I can run with the volume more like in the 40-60 range and I can more easily settle on a volume level that is "just right".  This filter needs "audio enhancements" enabled to work.

 

So, I need "audio enhancements" enabled, but I can't find any setting in Dell Optimizer that makes conference apps sound "normal".

 

I ended up removing Dell Optimizer and replacing it with an older MaxxAudio application.  It performs the same function as Optimizer for purposes of audio support (headset+microphone support / no audio pops / control over audio enhancements / etc.) but you can actually fully disable all of the enhancements if you like, and conference apps will sound unfiltered.  To disable enhancements, just open the app, hit each of the three main sections, and turn the toggle switch at the top off.  You'll have to repeat this for each output device that you use (system speakers, headphones, USB audio output, ...).

 

URL for the MaxxAudio app is:

https://apps.microsoft.com/store/detail/waves-maxxaudio-pro-for-dell-2019/9PJPPGG8TGVG?hl=en-us&gl=us

  • Thumb Up 1

Apple MacBook Pro 16-inch, 2023 (personal) • Dell Precision 7560 (work) • Full specs in spoiler block below
Info posts (Windows) — Turbo boost toggle • The problem with Windows 11 • About Windows 10/11 LTSC

Spoiler

Apple MacBook Pro 16-inch, 2023 (personal)

  • M2 Max
    • 4 efficiency cores
    • 8 performance cores
    • 38-core Apple GPU
  • 96GB LPDDR5-6400
  • 8TB SSD
  • macOS 15 "Sequoia"
  • 16.2" 3456×2234 120 Hz mini-LED ProMotion display
  • Wi-Fi 6E + Bluetooth 5.3
  • 99.6Wh battery
  • 1080p webcam
  • Fingerprint reader

Also — iPhone 12 Pro 512GB, Apple Watch Series 8

 

Dell Precision 7560 (work)

  • Intel Xeon W-11955M ("Tiger Lake")
    • 8×2.6 GHz base, 5.0 GHz turbo, hyperthreading ("Willow Cove")
  • 64GB DDR4-3200 ECC
  • NVIDIA RTX A2000 4GB
  • Storage:
    • 512GB system drive (Micron 2300)
    • 4TB additional storage (Sabrent Rocket Q4)
  • Windows 10 Enterprise LTSC 2021
  • 15.6" 3940×2160 IPS display
  • Intel Wi-Fi AX210 (Wi-Fi 6E + Bluetooth 5.3)
  • 95Wh battery
  • 720p IR webcam
  • Fingerprint reader

 

Previous

  • Dell Precision 7770, 7530, 7510, M4800, M6700
  • Dell Latitude E6520
  • Dell Inspiron 1720, 5150
  • Dell Latitude CPi
Link to comment
Share on other sites

this just irks me to no end,

look at cpu temps at idle, id say fair for doing nothing with LM TIM removed (Ultimate performance profile),

now look at GPU temps also doing nothing, the CPU is working at extremely low loads,
the GPU is not doing anything not even a basic calculation yet still temps are too high,
since GPU has no activity its dedicated fan is sleeping,

while CPU/GPU heat pipes intersection is overheating,
thermal management seems agnostic to the situation,

idle.thumb.jpg.2457791e6c43877625ae526711c6dbbf.jpg

 

the impossible is not impossible, its just haven't been done yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just noticed the "Storage" is set as "RAID On" in BIOS of my new 7770. This is weird, I never requested to have RAID on, especially when there is only one SSD installed.

 

I plan to have 4 SSD installed, and will primarily use Linux. Should I set it to "AHCI/NVMe"? Is there any added benefit for Dell to set it as "RAID On" by default?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, microdou said:

Just noticed the "Storage" is set as "RAID On" in BIOS of my new 7770. This is weird, I never requested to have RAID on, especially when there is only one SSD installed.

 

I plan to have 4 SSD installed, and will primarily use Linux. Should I set it to "AHCI/NVMe"? Is there any added benefit for Dell to set it as "RAID On" by default?

 

This has been normal since forever for Dell systems.  The BIOS defaults to RAID on — presumably so that boot configurations that depend on RAID won't get broken if the BIOS settings are reset for whatever reason.

 

If you don't need RAID, switching to AHCI/NVMe makes things a little simpler.  You don't have to worry about loading the Intel RST driver before you can see drives while installing Windows, for example.  Linux appears to tolerate RAID on just fine with individual drives, though it doesn't support the actual RAID arrays.

 

Note that if you switch between RAID on or not and you use Windows, you must take some steps to make Windows happy or you will get a boot failure.

  • Thumb Up 1

Apple MacBook Pro 16-inch, 2023 (personal) • Dell Precision 7560 (work) • Full specs in spoiler block below
Info posts (Windows) — Turbo boost toggle • The problem with Windows 11 • About Windows 10/11 LTSC

Spoiler

Apple MacBook Pro 16-inch, 2023 (personal)

  • M2 Max
    • 4 efficiency cores
    • 8 performance cores
    • 38-core Apple GPU
  • 96GB LPDDR5-6400
  • 8TB SSD
  • macOS 15 "Sequoia"
  • 16.2" 3456×2234 120 Hz mini-LED ProMotion display
  • Wi-Fi 6E + Bluetooth 5.3
  • 99.6Wh battery
  • 1080p webcam
  • Fingerprint reader

Also — iPhone 12 Pro 512GB, Apple Watch Series 8

 

Dell Precision 7560 (work)

  • Intel Xeon W-11955M ("Tiger Lake")
    • 8×2.6 GHz base, 5.0 GHz turbo, hyperthreading ("Willow Cove")
  • 64GB DDR4-3200 ECC
  • NVIDIA RTX A2000 4GB
  • Storage:
    • 512GB system drive (Micron 2300)
    • 4TB additional storage (Sabrent Rocket Q4)
  • Windows 10 Enterprise LTSC 2021
  • 15.6" 3940×2160 IPS display
  • Intel Wi-Fi AX210 (Wi-Fi 6E + Bluetooth 5.3)
  • 95Wh battery
  • 720p IR webcam
  • Fingerprint reader

 

Previous

  • Dell Precision 7770, 7530, 7510, M4800, M6700
  • Dell Latitude E6520
  • Dell Inspiron 1720, 5150
  • Dell Latitude CPi
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, MyPC8MyBrain said:

hmm... :icons8-face-with-monocle-100:

as it turns out we can achieve the same CB23 LM TIM results without LM TIM application,
regular off the shelf Kryonaut same as previous result just allowed the system to cool down,

1367809374_test22paste.thumb.jpg.fc4f385bd01200a26bcfa80d5d5dadf6.jpg

 

 

Sounds great! Thats in the top 5% of for short burst CPU performance for any laptop. Sounds like a winner, especially if the Sunon fans on yours do not make that creaking noise when they cycle on.

  • Thumb Up 2
  • Bump 1

Desktop - 12900KS, 32GB DDR5-6400 C32, 2TB WD SN850, Windows 10 Pro 22H2

Clevo X170SM - 10900K, 32GB DDR4-2933 CL17, 4TB WD SN850X, RTX 3080 mobile, 17.3 inch FHD 144hz, System76 open source firmware, Windows 10 Pro 22H2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, MyPC8MyBrain said:

hmm... :icons8-face-with-monocle-100:

as it turns out we can achieve the same CB23 LM TIM results without LM TIM application,
regular off the shelf Kryonaut same as previous result just allowed the system to cool down,

1367809374_test22paste.thumb.jpg.fc4f385bd01200a26bcfa80d5d5dadf6.jpg

 

Are those with the stock pads? I've been eyeing some thermal grizzly minus pads and conductonaut but with your findings maybe just a $15 of kyronaut or maybe I'll try my big tube of nht1, which is sufficient for my 280mm aio (poorly) cooled 6900xt, would allow similar results for my laptop.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just a quick recap:

 

1. Heatsink/cooling system has been replaced, now it's the Sunon variant - which to me are still audible while spinning up (I think that's what @win32asmguy is referring to with the "creaking" noise). To me it sounds a bit more silent but I guess that's also a matter of taste. I just don't care.. 😉

Result: core temp distribution changed. Max. delta of 20 became 12, but there's probably way more to those deltas than only the paste job (thinking of core quality/leakage/contact pressure), so I'm not too sure if that's a good or a bad thing. After all: minimal CB benefits.

 

2. Mainboard has been replaced now, too and results got better, reaching 21k first run in CB23 with the usual suspects of uv, ia/llc, PL1/2 tuning etc.. maybe I'll invest a little more time, but as it's settling to stable 19k even after 10 minutes, I'm now on the verge of "being okay with it". Guess that magic 20k barrier was crucial to my inner monk.

 

3. Turns out decreasing cache ratio to 32 actually improves performance -at least for CB23- by enabling voltage reduction by -100mV, which was not possible before. In fact, 32 seems to be a sweet spot, as higher and lower values reproducibly decrease CB results. Could be related to the integrated memory controller. Would be highly interested if some of you share these experiences?!

 

Questions:

- Has anyone of you seen a setup var for the cache ratio? Haven't seen anything obvious in the decompiled bios.
  Otherwise I'd have to figure out, how to set it from linux.
  Putting rock-stable values to bios vars would just be pretty convenient.

- Same question regarding offset voltages.. 🙂
 

Finally, as some others already pointed out (thanks for the nice rant @ATAN) : it's such a shame Dell didn't add proper cooling into that otherwise real beauty.. Thinking of one or two more heatsinks/-pipes and maybe another fan.

Why, Dell..?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, MyPC8MyBrain said:

hmm... :icons8-face-with-monocle-100:

as it turns out we can achieve the same CB23 LM TIM results without LM TIM application,
regular off the shelf Kryonaut same as previous run just allowed the system to cool down,

1367809374_test22paste.thumb.jpg.fc4f385bd01200a26bcfa80d5d5dadf6.jpg

 


You really make me jealous.. but getting closer! 🤪
So you're repasting your machine on a regular base?

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did you actually receive your machines with a recent bios version / did you see performance impacts during updates?

The first 7770 board came with 1.5.6, now I got 1.2.1. and wondering, if I should update, as going down from 1.5.6+ is blocked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I made a clean windows install in the new nvme disk I installed, applied the TS changes and IA AC/DC LoadLine changes and ran the tests again, this time the results were much better than the results that I had when I received the unit, without applying any changes.

I also have the Cool power profile set.

1006379657_Screenshot(2).thumb.png.424b94149d41947cc8c9f6844dfdb6e5.png

 

Why is my Cache Ratio locked and the offset remains zero? I also noticed that I get slight better results if I uncheck the High Performance option...

 

193026359_Screenshot(3).thumb.png.430ef5bd610d52039f4a4af1acd190de.png

 

I opened my unit just to install the new nvme drives and took some photos, I ordered a PTM7950 pad sheet that will arrive in the next days, then I'll apply it. I didn't want to remove the heat sink now as I didn't want to mess with the thermal paste/pad already applied while I wait for mine to arrive.

 

Can you guys tell by the photos if my unit has the "better" heatsink or not? Anyway, when I get the new pad sheet I will remove it to apply, run the tests again and post my results.

 

My unit also came with the latest BIOS installed.

 

Thanks!

20221018_164146.jpg

20221018_163228.jpg

20221018_164151.jpg

  • Thumb Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, keks2k said:

So you're repasting your machine on a regular base?

no I don't, I applied LM TIM (if scroll back you can see my posts and pics),
my unit is going back to Dell soon, in prep i removed my LM TIM and re-applied Kryonaut TIM,

  

47 minutes ago, brunooo84 said:

Can you guys tell by the photos if my unit has the "better" heatsink or not?

from your pics you appear to have the same part number my unit has,
my unit came from factory with the sunon fans installed,
 

the impossible is not impossible, its just haven't been done yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just restarted my machine, ran the tests again but this time without opening TS and the results are exactly the same... I must be doing something dumb and TS is not working at all or for some reason it doesn't make any difference to my machine?

 

I'm confused... 😒

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Terms of Use