-
Posts
111 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by Amir.s
-
Is everything working fine now? No more issues?If you want the changes you made in RU to persist and not reset, apply this change: 0xB66 = 00
- 35 replies
-
- area-51m r1
- 9900ks
-
(and 5 more)
Tagged with:
-
Is everything working fine now? No more issues?If you want the changes you made in RU to persist and not reset, apply this change: 0xB66 = 00
- 35 replies
-
- area-51m r1
- 9900ks
-
(and 5 more)
Tagged with:
-
Wow, both versions are awesome. Alienware isn’t available in my country, and unfortunately, I can’t buy from eBay either. I’m really curious to see how much of a performance difference there is compared to the R1, especially in terms of CPU performance. If you get a chance, I’d love to see some benchmarks from it.
-
Did you buy the R2 laptop or the panel?
-
I hope it helped you. Let me know how it goes, and we can try to improve it even further.
- 35 replies
-
- area-51m r1
- 9900ks
-
(and 5 more)
Tagged with:
-
If you want, I can tell you what changes to make in RU.EFI so that the settings you apply in RU.EFI won’t reset anymore and will only be reset by clearing the BIOS/CMOS.
- 35 replies
-
- area-51m r1
- 9900ks
-
(and 5 more)
Tagged with:
-
I’d suggest tightening your RAM timings a bit. Since your RAM is already running at tighter timings than its standard settings, I think CL18 should be easily achievable. This should noticeably reduce memory latency, and you’ll definitely see the difference in benchmarks. Going from CL21 to CL18 could make a significant difference.
-
0x43F3E One Of: Enable Root Port, VarStoreInfo (VarOffset/VarName): 0x98F, VarStore: 0x1, QuestionId: 0x4C6, Size: 1, Min: 0x0, Max 0x2, Step: 0x0 {05 91 CE 08 D1 08 C6 04 01 00 8F 09 10 10 00 02 00} 0x43F4F One Of Option: Disabled, Value (8 bit): 0x0 {09 07 8F 00 00 00 00} 0x43F56 One Of Option: Enabled, Value (8 bit): 0x1 (default) {09 07 8E 00 30 00 01} 0x43F5D One Of Option: Auto, Value (8 bit): 0x2 {09 07 8D 00 00 00 02} 0x43F64 End One Of {29 02} 0x43F66 One Of: Max Link Speed, VarStoreInfo (VarOffset/VarName): 0x993, VarStore: 0x1, QuestionId: 0x4C7, Size: 1, Min: 0x0, Max 0x3, Step: 0x0 {05 91 D4 08 D5 08 C7 04 01 00 93 09 10 10 00 03 00} 0x43F77 One Of Option: Auto, Value (8 bit): 0x0 (default) {09 07 8D 00 30 00 00} 0x43F7E One Of Option: Gen1, Value (8 bit): 0x1 {09 07 C6 09 00 00 01} 0x43F85 One Of Option: Gen2, Value (8 bit): 0x2 {09 07 C7 09 00 00 02} 0x43F8C One Of Option: Gen3, Value (8 bit): 0x3 {09 07 C8 09 00 00 03} 0x43F93 End One Of {29 02} 0x43F95 Suppress If {0A 82} 0x43F97 QuestionId: 0xE80 equals value 0x0 {12 06 80 0E 00 00} 0x43F9D One Of: Max Link Width, VarStoreInfo (VarOffset/VarName): 0x997, VarStore: 0x1, QuestionId: 0x4C8, Size: 1, Min: 0x0, Max 0x3, Step: 0x0 {05 91 9F 06 A2 06 C8 04 01 00 97 09 10 10 00 03 00} 0x43FAE One Of Option: Auto, Value (8 bit): 0x0 (default) {09 07 8D 00 30 00 00} 0x43FB5 One Of Option: Force X1, Value (8 bit): 0x1 {09 07 A3 06 00 00 01} 0x43FBC One Of Option: Force X2, Value (8 bit): 0x2 {09 07 A4 06 00 00 02} 0x43FC3 One Of Option: Force X4, Value (8 bit): 0x3 {09 07 A5 06 00 00 03} 0x43FCA End One Of {29 02} 0x43FCC One Of: Power Down Unused Lanes, VarStoreInfo (VarOffset/VarName): 0x99B, VarStore: 0x1, QuestionId: 0x4C9, Size: 1, Min: 0x0, Max 0x1, Step: 0x0 {05 91 75 06 76 06 C9 04 01 00 9B 09 10 10 00 01 00} 0x43FDD One Of Option: Disabled, Value (8 bit): 0x0 {09 07 8F 00 00 00 00} 0x43FE4 One Of Option: Auto, Value (8 bit): 0x1 (default) {09 07 8D 00 30 00 01} 0x43FEB End One Of {29 02} We are going to do this now: lock the AGA to PCIe Gen3 and x4 so the link speed and width cannot drop, ensuring it operates at x4 from the beginning. We will also disable Power Down Unused Lanes so the unused PCIe lanes are not powered down. 0x993 = 03 0x997 = 03 0x99B = 00 Apply these changes, then check whether the errors are reduced or not. Let me know the results so we can investigate further. By the way, are you sure the AGA cable is definitely working properly?
- 35 replies
-
- area-51m r1
- 9900ks
-
(and 5 more)
Tagged with:
-
My friend, I want us to run a few tests together. Go into RU.EFI and check this option. If it is Enabled, disable it: ACPI D3Cold Support = Disabled Current value: 0x425 = 01 Then do the following several times: Perform a complete shutdown. Power on the laptop with the AGA + RTX 5080 connected. Check the PCIe Error Counters in GPU-Z. Run a demanding game or GPU stress test. Repeat the Cold Boot test several times. If the rate of Bad Boots noticeably decreases, that would be a strong clue that the problem is related to PCIe Power State / Power Sequencing. If nothing changes, we can change the setting back to Enabled.
- 35 replies
-
- area-51m r1
- 9900ks
-
(and 5 more)
Tagged with:
-
Even with the Intel graphics enabled, the laptop still displays an image. What I mean is: once you’re in Windows, open Task Manager and disable the RTX 2080. Also, run the test using an external monitor at a resolution higher than 1080p. If you test at 1080p, the CPU will become a significant bottleneck. Also, tell me exactly what issue you’re having with the RTX 5080 on your system. Maybe I can think of something that will help us fix the problem.
- 35 replies
-
- area-51m r1
- 9900ks
-
(and 5 more)
Tagged with:
-
Both the Intel integrated graphics and the internal GPU should be disabled. Run the benchmark on an external monitor to get the best possible performance.
- 35 replies
-
- area-51m r1
- 9900ks
-
(and 5 more)
Tagged with:
-
Your CPU score is normal now. However, your GPU score is low. I remember you previously scored around 30K with it.
- 35 replies
-
- area-51m r1
- 9900ks
-
(and 5 more)
Tagged with:
-
If 0xA65 is not set to 01, none of the timings shown in the picture will be applied. That’s why the system fails to boot.
- 7 replies
-
- area-51m r1
- area-51m
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
BIOS 1.9.3 becomes unstable at memory frequencies above 2666 MHz. You should downgrade to BIOS 1.7.3. If you do not enable 0xA65, you won’t be able to achieve higher frequencies because the timings selected automatically will not be appropriate. I tested this on BIOS 1.9.3 and it has limitations.
- 7 replies
-
- area-51m r1
- area-51m
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Set it according to the screenshot. Also, configure these three values as well: 0xA63 = 75 0xA64 = 0B 0xA65 = 01 If it’s stable, I’ll start lowering the timings afterward.
- 7 replies
-
- area-51m r1
- area-51m
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Your score looks perfectly fine. I only wish you had run a Time Spy benchmark with the RTX 5080 in this setup too — it would have been great to see and enjoy that Time Spy score as well
- 35 replies
-
- area-51m r1
- 9900ks
-
(and 5 more)
Tagged with:
-
- 35 replies
-
- area-51m r1
- 9900ks
-
(and 5 more)
Tagged with:
-
My score intel XTU 2 benchmark Area51m-R1 cpu 9900ks freq : 5100 Mhz all core Link: https://hwbot.org/benchmarks/xtu_2.0/submissions/6029701
- 35 replies
-
- area-51m r1
- 9900ks
-
(and 5 more)
Tagged with:
-
Time Spy is still a valid benchmark for evaluating both GPU and CPU performance. I am a professional overclocker and have extensive knowledge in this field. My benchmark results can be found on HWBOT. On an Area-51m, your processor should normally achieve a CPU score between 10,000 and 10,500 in Time Spy, unless there is an issue affecting the system’s performance.
- 35 replies
-
- area-51m r1
- 9900ks
-
(and 5 more)
Tagged with:
-
It has nothing to do with the RTX 5080. Install XTU version 7.14.2.93 and set Core Voltage Offset to -0.130V. Also set all CPU cores to 47x. Check in Task Manager to see how much the processor is being utilized. If CPU usage is between 2% and 8%, that is normal. Use HWiNFO to check the core temperatures. The CPU is not throttling. A score of 7500 is definitely not normal at all.
- 35 replies
-
- area-51m r1
- 9900ks
-
(and 5 more)
Tagged with:
-
Go into XTU and set the Core Voltage Offset to -0.120V, then set all cores to 4.8GHz and test it. Your CPU performance should improve significantly. If it’s stable, try lowering it further to -0.125V and test again. The CPU should stop throttling, and temperatures should drop as well. Your CPU score is terrible. You should be getting somewhere between 10,200 and 10,400 points. On my 9900K, I was completely stable at -0.140V with all cores running at 4.8GHz, and I had absolutely no throttling.
- 35 replies
-
- area-51m r1
- 9900ks
-
(and 5 more)
Tagged with: