Mr. Fox

True. Arc A770 is 3060 Ti performance range and I am not sure if that is some the 3060 Ti can handle well. Arc A750 and the "lite" version of A770 are also light on VRAM (only 8GB). One really should not entertain the idea of buying a new GPU for gaming with only 8GB, or less, unless it is dirt cheap and no demanding games are being played.

Dayyyuuum. Is that your sucky CPU, brother? Central has accepted my RMA on the basis that the product sold to me is defective (at least it seems they have) and they issued an authorization to return. They said the refund should be processed by the next or second business day. It truly is defective, and so is that example you are showing. You should seek to return it and request a refund. It is unfit for the purpose for which it was created. It is a downgrade, not a "Special Edition" unless special means a sarcastic expression of "special" LOL. And, you are right... not worth your time to do this. Just keep what you have or buy a good CPU bin used. All of my good CPUs have been purchased used since the one nice 10900KF that my Z490 Apex destroyed. I am always unlucky in the lottery buying new. I didn't realize that was still a thing. I thought it was a fad that came and went. Nobody talks about it anymore, at least commercially. Perhaps it is just not something that Intel sees a lucrative market for so they haven't bothered to support it.

I sent this to you via text as well. I had no trouble with 6800 on the 12900K/KS in the Z690 Unify-X and that was when DDR5 was super immature and a work in process. Things have changed dramatically since 12th Gen in terms of firmware and memory. If you go with a 4-DIMM motherboard you are going to be limited to around 7200 max no matter what CPU. I think the limiting factor with 12th Gen was immature DDR5 technology more than the CPU itself.

They are all part of the problem. None offer solutions. They live to promote AI (Skynet) and a Godless planet where it is OK to say, think, do, be anything you want as long as it does not involve honesty, integrity, morality, decency or freedom to express opposition to a depraved world view or a perspective that is contrary to their agenda. In a society where no behavior or belief is wrong and everything is OK, only disagreement is unacceptable and expression of opposing views is intolerable.

I decided to go back to BIOS 1501 on my white Apex and I was able to downgrade the Intel ME version to the proper version for 1501 using the MSI ME Update tool for ME_16.1.30.2264. Completed without error, and now I don't have the latest cancer. Thanks, MSI. 👍 ME_16-1-30-2264_fwupdate-zip Instant performance boost with older ME... Also better memory performance. 8400 runs like 8600 and has lower latency with older ME. It seems like she is smiling again...

At least MSI has the fundamental decency and basic common courtesy to not bundle ME filth into their BIOS update and leave it to the discretion of their customer to decide whether or not to download and flash the cancer update. I flashed the latest BIOS to my Z790i Edge, but it was my decision whether or not to ignore the fact that there is an ME update. Not only that, they allow downgrading ME to an older version if you want to. Don't like the ME update they made available? Not a problem. Download an older version directly from your product support page and flash it. No fuss, no muss. It is inexcusable, disgusting and shameful that ASUS does not give the choice to the people that step up to the plate and fork out big bucks for their overpriced CPU-killing motherboards to do the same. See below... SFF hotbox Mini-ITX with a consumer-grade 360 AIO... average 14900K (SP96)... no firmware cancer to gum up the works. (This is the mobo from @electrosoft and the CPU from @Talon.) Are you sure you like ASUS Brother @Papusan?

The people that worry about warranty will be pleased to know that if they need to make a warranty claim they will have to lie to Intel and tell them the CPU and RAM (including XMP) were never overclocked or tuned because Intel's position is now that any form of overclocking the cores or memory or running outside of default spec, that there is no warranty. It is void. Intel doesn't care what people do. If you load BIOS defaults on an ASUS motherboard (which is not Intel spec) and tell Intel the truth, ASUS has voided your warranty for you.

The numbers seemed OK, not great, on the surface, but as I began testing it the voltage needs were beyond insane. Along with the temperatures, it is essentially a downgrade and unusable unless someone is OK with embracing 103°C load temps. It might be OK on DICE, LN2 or cascade, but not worth having on water cooling. Even with the chiller keeping the water at 16°C the temps were totally out of control. I hope Central does not give me any hassle with the return/refund.

Congratulations. Looks like you got a good one. As usual, I didn't. 😑 I called Central this morning about an RMA. The had me fill out a form online. So, now I wait to find out. 😟

That is a really nice chip. It's what a 14900KS should have looked like. That is about 150mV less than what the 14900KS I am returning would have needed for the P-cores and the E-cores could barely handle 4.7GHz. Here's this... Cooler Master MM712-Wired Mouse Review Now this is a pretty amazing ...

14900KF - P 60x / E 48x / Cache 52x - NOT AI overclocked.

Yes, thank God. Hopefully, ASUS doesn't kill it as well. The more hours I spent trying to make it usuable the more frustrated I got. It's not worth keeping. It's a piece of trash. Even trying to de-tune it to run at 13900KS/14900K/KF clocks is a no go. It guzzles voltage and power beyond reason functionality in Cinebench. Trying to use settings that @tps3443 was suggesting (L4 and Auto) was seeing spike up to my 1.700V cap and idle voltage at 1.650V, load voltage in the 1.450V range, which cannot be managed effectively unless you are using LN2 or cascade cooling. AMD will never be open for consideration again for me. They don't offer any products that I am interested in buying. So, I am wondering if maybe the systems I own now will be my last. I'm not liking anything at all in the computing technology realm. Windows sucks, gaming sucks more than it ever has before. It's no longer any fun to bench on HWBOT because of how things are. Winners are predestined and receive parts and firmware nobody else has access to. Everything is grossly overpriced and the OEMs are becoming anti-overclock. So, really there is nothing left for me at this point. It was fun while it lasted, but my patience is wearing thin with the way that everything is designed by idiots for idiots. I am starting to hate all of the companies involved (Intel, AMD, NVIDIA, ASUS, Microsoft... all run by imbeciles with the endoresements and blessings of their retarded fanboy possees.) In my futuile effort to make a silk purse of the 14900KS sow's ear, I booted into my Windoze 11 Cancer OS and fired up XTU. I guess there is now an AI overclocking feature. Super stupid. I had not seen it before. It tuned mulltple cores for 6.3GHz and the rest at 6.2GHz, about 1.625V on VCore. It ran and it was stable, but was not usable due to overheating and thermal throttling with my water chilled to 16°C. Cinebench pulled over 650W before it collapsed from heat, at which point the core clocks dropped to about 53x on the P-cores and 41x on E-cores and under 40K Cinebench score. Utterly worthless. It might not have overheated playing games. But, yeah... like I give a rat's butt about that.

Back to the better CPU...

Yes, I tried the latest from ASUS and other betas, even old BIOS. I am not trying any more. Already wasted too many hours on this poorly binned piece of trash. I will just be content with the excellent 13900KS and 14900KF CPUs that I already own. The voltage needs are what they are and it will always be too hot unless I detune it to match 13900KS or 14900K and if that has to be done the KS is meaningless and serves no purpose. It is going back and I am not buying another one. It is cleaned up and back in the box. I will call them Monday for an RMA number. I even booted into my cancer OS 11 and ran XTU AI tuning and it tuned 63x on several cores and 62x on the rest and it throttles down to 5.6GHz in Cinebench and reaches 107°C. It would probably be OK for a gamer where the CPU never has to work, but it is unsuitable for the purpose for which I bought it. Gaming is not that important to me. If it were then I would be buying an i7 and running it stock.

The reason it is slower is because of excessive voltage, overheating and thermal throttling. It doesn't perform as advertised because nothing normal is capable of cooling it. You would ne need LN2 for daily driver cooling to run it at the rated clock speeds. In order for it to be a usable product you have to de-tune it and make it function like a K so there is no point in having a KS unless you are the 1 in 1000 that gets a god tier CPU.

I cannot get it to run Cinebench R23. It errors out. I do not think the firmware is right for KS. Something is off. Yeah, the e-cores are trash, but they were also trash on all of the 14900K/KF that I returned. 13900KS e-cores were almost always better than 14th Gen CPUs for me. I am seriously thinking about calling them on Monday and ask them to accept a return as a defective product. You would need cascade or LN2 for this to be usable at advertised clock speeds. I am not happy with it. It is a voltage pig and runs too hot to be usable. If I delid it and go bare die that might fix it, but then it would no longer be returnable if that doesn't fix it. With BIOS defaults it idles at 45°C and sits at 1.527V. If you have to tune it down to 14900K clock ratios then owning a KS is totally pointless because it can't be used with default clocks.

Yes, they are very close. I'll probably use it with the IHS this weekend then move it to bare die next weekend. So far it seems very close to the same silicon quality as my 14900KF. So, now I will sell the two dead 13900K/KS and my good SP108 13900KS. And, I will keep the 14900K that I bought from you for an emergency backup. Once I get this 14900KS on bare die and can do better head-to-head comparisons with the 14900KF I will keep the better one on the Apex and move the other one to Muchkin. I'm going to leave my hands on the Apex Encore and the 13900KS in that setup because it's the best I have had before and I don't want to disturb anything to upset the apple cart. The performance regressions are already evident to me. All 14900K/KF seem to have slightly lower performance than my 13900KS and Cinebench scores seeem to creep a little lower with each ME and Microcode update. Memory latency also seems to grow a little with each update. Memory latency with this new 14900KS is about 1 ns worse than the 14900KF and 13900KS using the same memory profile. As usual, updates are actually downgrades. Only good for those obsessed with "security" and suck for everyone else.

Well, yours is better than mine, but considering some of the horror stories I am seeing I think I did better than some folks. I was hoping it would be better, but it could certainly be a lot worse. It's not bad enough that I can get away with sending it back, and trying to exchange it for a better one might end badly. I think ASUS needs to make some changes to firmware because my LLC tuning isn't having the expected effect. VID stays high no matter where I set the DC_LL. Not sure if it is relevant or not, but mine is also made in the USA.

If this is printed on the box and an "S" is tacked on the end of the product name because it is "special" then it needs to be special. If it is a KS and it is not better than a K, then it's not true and you were sold a bill of goods. You deserve to get your money back. There will always be duds, and duds should be exchanged at no cost to the purchaser. But, the average KS should always (100% of the time, not randomly) be better than the average K or you're getting screwed. If that is not illegal, it should be.

Yeah that is unacceptable. And, the return police wouldn't have a job if they were not throwing turds at the wall to see how many stick. It's actually shameful to think that they would expect people to say nothing and be content with defective samples. They should expect people smart enough to know better to demand something acceptable, send back the trash and ask for an exchange or a refund.

I would be satisfied to have one like that SP105 @Talon got. It is almost the same as the SP102 14900KF I have with SP114 P-cores, but the E-cores are better. I mean, who would not like having a god-tier chip? But, I don't need one to be content. I just need it not to be a boiling hot piece of crap that takes an absurd amount of voltage for stock or modest overclock and I think that I'm seeing too many examples of defective trash that will overheat running stock clocks.

Yes. I have 0.1mm and 0.2mm and the 0.2mm is too thick and doesn't work well, even for temporary testing. It can't transfeer the heat as well as the 0.1mm foil. I haven't tried 0.05mm but I think it would too thin and fragile to be reusable. The 0.1mm works fantastic for short term testing. I think I could use it permanently on my work computer and not have any issues with thermals. Wow, that must be something new. I have not seen an Intel CPU before that was labeled as made in USA. Most have been Taiwan (better ones) and China (often the worst). I wonder if it came from the plant here in AZ?

The indium sheets? I got them from a place in Mesa, AZ (through Amazon) that sells industrial thermal products. Totally reusable. I've only cut square from a 100x100mm sheet that I have used about a half-dozen times. It never gets hot enough to melt or stick to the IHS or waterblock. It works about as well as KPx or MX-6 does on a CPU that has not been delidded as long as you cinch down the waterblock good and tight. You'll still be pushing 100°C in Cinebench, but it's totally acceptable for just about anything else. Works better than TG Kryosheet and isn't a fragile single-use option. https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B092Z8QDS8 I guess now we know why so little has been said by Intel about the 14900KS release, apart from the recycled press releases a few weeks ago to confirm the leak was true, there has been next to nothing. Interesting observations in the conclusion. Things are looking kind of sucky on both sides of the fence. Overclocking enthusiasts: Intel: higher power draw with minimal performance gain over K CPU, higher price tag Gaming enthusiasts: AMD: half the power draw, equally high temperatures, lower gaming performance, poor overclocking, cheaper

The three that I returned to NewEgg and Amazon last month were tested with a sheet of indium sandwiched between the waterblock and heatsink and were not tested beyond a view of the VF curve and an F12 screenshot saved as evidence of unacceptability. No cleanup whatsoever. The indium sheet leaves no visible traces of installation and keeps the CPU as cool as cheap thermal paste.