-
Posts
5,387 -
Joined
-
Days Won
569
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by Mr. Fox
-
It's unfortunate that certain groups want to silence voices and opinions they do not agree with and characterize them as evil, crazy, spreaders of disinformation and other things. It reflects more poorly on those haters than it does those who are the victims and their objects of hate. I think it is fine to think whatever they want to think, but trying to silence them with mischaracterizations that are an ironic reflection of themselves fits the cliche of the pot calling the kettle black. It probably terrifies them that the Jones they want to cast as a lunatic has been so freakishly accurate with his information, forecasts and predictions that they have worked so tirelessly to prevent from becoming public knowledge.
-
*Official Benchmark Thread* - Post it here or it didn't happen :D
Mr. Fox replied to Mr. Fox's topic in Desktop Hardware
Truthfully, I think it was the last version that did. Everything they have produced since then sucks it instead of kicking it. They haven't managed to do anything right in the grand scheme of things since then. Only varying degrees of worthless and a relentless pursuit of failure. They are approaching the threshold of mastering incompetence. -
*Official Benchmark Thread* - Post it here or it didn't happen :D
Mr. Fox replied to Mr. Fox's topic in Desktop Hardware
It would make no difference to me if they worked better and/or looked better, or both. I will not pay $30 each for a fan. I don't care how good it is. None are worth that much. That is just far too expensive. I will not purchase a fan that costs more than $10 to $15 each and I shoot for about $5 each. Those Apex fans would cost about $540 on my MO-RA 360 and $270 for my Nova. Not enough benefit if the fans cost that much no matter how great the fan performs. -
*Official Benchmark Thread* - Post it here or it didn't happen :D
Mr. Fox replied to Mr. Fox's topic in Desktop Hardware
So, on 14900K a P-core SP109 voltage is essentially equivalent to voltage for a P-core SP120 rating on a 13900KS. At least for now, based on that table. It is too bad they are not tracking the voltage requirements for the E-cores by SP rating. That would have made it even more useful. It looks like the average 14900KS has P-cores with the same silicon quality as both of my 13900KS and worse e-core silicon sample. So, if I purchased an average 14900K it would not be an upgrade due to the frequency/prevalence of lower quality e-cores. -
*Official Benchmark Thread* - Post it here or it didn't happen :D
Mr. Fox replied to Mr. Fox's topic in Desktop Hardware
Congrats on the CPU. It looks like the voltage requirement is about 0.040V less than my second 13900KS at both 6.0GHz and 5.8GHz on P-cores (SP120) and about 0.025V more on your E-cores than my 13900KS (SP97). Overall SP ratings are 107 and 112, respectively. Comparing your SP107 (SP117/88) 14900K to my other 13900KS SP108 (SP120/88) the voltage requirements are even further apart. So, the scaling is drastically different and cannot be directly compared (which we already expected). -
*Official Benchmark Thread* - Post it here or it didn't happen :D
Mr. Fox replied to Mr. Fox's topic in Desktop Hardware
Oh, I totally agree. And, I am not making excuses for them. QC is no longer something anyone in tech does right. QC is in the toilet. But, we also shouldn't penalize a company for being transparent and providing a detailed change log or release notes. Contrast that long list of things they fixed (which should be expected, not viewed as being special,) and the transparency of information with change logs and release notes that are empty, incomplete and meaningless, or even totally non-existent. Release notes that say almost nothing like "improves memory performance" or "support for next gen processor" that we so often see are essentially worthless and may omit things that matter a lot. It makes me suspicious and raises questions about what they are hiding. -
vomi 🤢🤮👎 um... no.
-
*Official Benchmark Thread* - Post it here or it didn't happen :D
Mr. Fox replied to Mr. Fox's topic in Desktop Hardware
Most of the "supporting software" we see from the OEMs is buggy, bloated garbage. If I had to identify something positive (like the needle in the haystack) it would be that they fixed a lot of broken stuff. We should expect them to. If I contrast that with extreme trash like Armory Crate it seems positive on the surface. iCue seems better, in the same way that that polio is better than brain cancer. -
These kids are pretty talented. Liliac is a 5-piece Atlanta-based, family Rock/Metal female-fronted band consisting of all siblings ages 16-24. The lead singer has a nice set of pipes.
-
Correct. No. In fact, doing it should be prosecuted as a felony if it happens in a public venue. It should only be acceptable in a private club or organization designed to be an echo chamber exclusively for like-minded individuals. In that scenario, expression of a differing view is trolling in a place you have no right to be and are not welcomed.
-
*Official Benchmark Thread* - Post it here or it didn't happen :D
Mr. Fox replied to Mr. Fox's topic in Desktop Hardware
A770 has no problem tearing up Gears of War 4 or Gears 5. -
*Official Benchmark Thread* - Post it here or it didn't happen :D
Mr. Fox replied to Mr. Fox's topic in Desktop Hardware
These products are for a very special market segment. So special, in fact, that Tom wrote a song about them. Interesting metal case fans from Alphacool... I like how they are made but $30 each is too expensive. -
I am glad to see more and more examples of public dialogue occurring against the cockamamie idea of an EV world without an infrastructure or desire for it. I think it is time to take back the ground we have lost by letting goofballs control the narrative and push their lies. $7000 is still too much for something you don't want even if it were being offered for free.
-
*Official Benchmark Thread* - Post it here or it didn't happen :D
Mr. Fox replied to Mr. Fox's topic in Desktop Hardware
Yes, I agree. Now, if (and only if) you can get a good pair of the 16GB modules they are better... much tighter timings and lower latency, but they are hit or miss. I've got the 48GB G.Kill kit dialed in 24/7 stable at 8600. It works great, but my 8200 profile with the 2*16 generic sticks with much tighter timings performs on par with 8600 speed with the looser timings and has lower latency. Seems like everything today is a silicon lottery crap shoot. I am starting to get sick of the amount of nonsense we have to deal with in terms of PC components. There is too much chintzy junk, or grossly overpriced parts; or the deadly combo of chintzy and grossly overpriced junk parts. If I am totally honest, I am also starting to find it hard to identify any major components that I am interested in buying even if I had tons of disposable cash to blow on anything I wanted. This is particularly true of video cards and motherboards. In a very undesirable manner, it is reminding me of the reason I abandoned laptops. There was nothing available that was special or good enough that I would be willing to waste my money buying it. Not quite there yet, but dangerously close. We are surrounded by lots of tacky gamer e-waste designed to titillate the senses of the RGB fangirls. -
*Official Benchmark Thread* - Post it here or it didn't happen :D
Mr. Fox replied to Mr. Fox's topic in Desktop Hardware
Congrats. You got a good kit. I RMA'd that exact same kit a couple of weeks ago. It was defective. Couldn't pass any memory tests using the XMP profile with defaults or after giving it more voltage. And, it was unbootable using a saved profile that worked flawlessly with other modules. Edit: I take that back. The trash kit I RMA'd was 2*16GB not 2*24GB. The 32GB kit was rubbish. -
My employer uses Google services for many things and at least once a week (at least it feels that frequent) Google makes a change that looks and feels repulsive. They continually dumb things down, bloat the UI, create ugliness and do things that diminish usefulness and user experience. They make using a PC feel like I am using a tablet or smartphone and I despise them for it. Micro$lop isn't really any better. They are two turds in the same toilet. I'd love to flush them both down the drain, along with the third turd (crApple). All three companies are sewer rats.
-
*Official Benchmark Thread* - Post it here or it didn't happen :D
Mr. Fox replied to Mr. Fox's topic in Desktop Hardware
Wow, that's just brutal. It's sad to see examples of a government financially assaulting its citizens in such a malicious manner. It is just so ethically perverse, wrong and messed up. -
PCI-E ssd card adapter not recognized in acer AC100
Mr. Fox replied to kojack's topic in Desktop Hardware
If may be as simple as needing to register it in Secure Boot or disabling Secure Boot so it will work. I hope so. You can run in UEFI mode with no CSM support with Secure Boot disabled just fine. I do that on all of my system because Secure Boot will prevent certain types of Windows software from functioning and often does not play nice with Linux. It also was not supported by Windows 7 and I was still using Windows 7 until I could no longer get working drivers (4090 and Arc A770 have no drivers). -
*Official Benchmark Thread* - Post it here or it didn't happen :D
Mr. Fox replied to Mr. Fox's topic in Desktop Hardware
Nice write-up, brother. Any idea what "misc" voltage is actually for? -
PCI-E ssd card adapter not recognized in acer AC100
Mr. Fox replied to kojack's topic in Desktop Hardware
I'm not familiar with the options available in your BIOS, but what you describe sounds as if the PCIE slot itself is not being initialized during POST. Have you already poked around for options to designate the slot the card is installed in as being bootable? You may have to choose between that slot or eSATA, for example. That card should work nicely. I have several like it. The fact that the drive is visible once you load windows and you can install TrueNAS to it, but it does not show during POST suggests a BIOS configuration option is either missing or not toggled for it to become bootable. If you have Secure Boot enabled that could also be complicating matters. You would need to register it in Secure Boot as a boot device if the device supports it. I do not know if TrueNAS supports it. You can try disabling Secure Boot if it is enabled. At least for troubleshooting. Secure Boot introduces numerous functionality complications and this may be a manifestation of one of them. Everything works out better for me and there are fewer headaches to deal with it when it is disabled. -
*Official Benchmark Thread* - Post it here or it didn't happen :D
Mr. Fox replied to Mr. Fox's topic in Desktop Hardware
It looks like they are going to scrap the 4090D now, so that's good. A world without China's participation would be a better place for everyone else. It does not really matter what the law says, China will steal whatever they want if they can't buy it. They do that already even when they can buy it. Attempting to skirt a law designed to hurt or hinder China's success and prosperity should carry a severe punishment by itself for NVIDIA or any other company looking for a loophole. It should be viewed as a form of treason and aiding and abetting organized crime. In addition to that, payback for COVID should be severe and have no expiration date. Those involved on our side (Fauchi and company) should be looking at facing capital punishment. Ask a Uyghur that has had family members executed or a Christian that has been imprisoned or executed for their faith how they feel about China's government. -
*Official Benchmark Thread* - Post it here or it didn't happen :D
Mr. Fox replied to Mr. Fox's topic in Desktop Hardware
The only way this can ever get fixed is if enough people wise up and make it impossible for the imbeciles scalping the public to earn a living by forcing them into bankruptcy and shutting down their businesses with aging inventory that is only sellable at a price less than what they paid for it. I doubt there are enough intelligent people for that to happen, but I would love to be proven wrong. If things turn out like they should, it will turn out like this for all of them... -
*Official Benchmark Thread* - Post it here or it didn't happen :D
Mr. Fox replied to Mr. Fox's topic in Desktop Hardware
Unbelievably stupid, but not as unbelievable and stupid as the reality that idiots are willing pay that price (and even a lot more than that) for one. They are responsible for it just as much as the dishonest people scalping the public. Scalpers can't scalp if there are no people dumb enough to be compliant. It is $2500 to $2800 on Amazon depending on who the slime ball seller is. Like it or not, all of us suffer the consequences and misfortune of an idiotic minority's existence. -
Better yet... Copilot functionality be disabled in the registry. Copy and paste in the command below in an elevated PowerShell or Teminal window and press enter: reg add HKCU\Software\Policies\Microsoft\Windows\WindowsCopilot /v TurnOffWindowsCopilot /t REG_DWORD /d 1 /f Then sign out and back in or reboot for the change to take effect. To re-enable, as if you would ever want to, you can use the command: reg delete HKCU\Software\Policies\Microsoft\Windows\WindowsCopilot /f I am looking for a script to completely uninstall/delete Copilot like the one I use for Defender. That would make it permanent and irreversible, which would be ideal. Anything we can do to facilitate or contribute to the failure of AI development, no matter how seemingly small, is worth doing. I'd love to see all of the "investors" lose their butt and end up scrapping the idea.