*Official Benchmark Thread* - Post it here or it didn't happen :D

[electrosoft]

18 minutes ago, jaybee83 said:

 

 

bromance at its finest, you two are cute 😄 

 

And there goes my tea......

 

thanks for that. 🤣

[Mr. Fox]

29 minutes ago, jaybee83 said:

 

 

bromance at its finest, you two are cute 😄 

LOL. Any man that doesn't love his friends and family is either a liar or a monster. Any man that is scared to admit it because they are worried someone is going to think they are queer needs to seek professional help. I think the underlying issue is many confusing love as being somehow related to carnal instincts and they're totally different. It is sad to know that the former is totally missing from the lives of some people, while the latter is something we have in common with animals.

[jaybee83]

1 hour ago, Mr. Fox said:

LOL. Any man that doesn't love his friends and family is either a liar or a monster. Any man that is scared to admit it because they are worried someone is going to think they are queer needs to seek professional help. I think the underlying issue is many confusing love as being somehow related to carnal instincts and they're totally different. It is sad to know that the former is totally missing from the lives of some people, while the latter is something we have in common with animals.

 

aw cmon, no need to explain urself, i think its great 😄 

[tps3443]

Tested the Black Myth WuKong benchmark. My 4090 does not particularly overclock all that well. It ran 2,895Mhz on the boost through the entire benchmark. But here goes. It seems the 4090 will get this title done pretty well maxed out at 4K. Especially with further updates and optimization I hope it gets even better! I tried to disable motion-blur and turn anti-aliasing to low, this only resulted in a +1 FPS improvement lol. So, I left it on for the below run.

These settings are how I will play the game. 

4K/DLSS@66%=Quality DLSS/ Ray Tracing=ON/ Frame Gen=ON

 

I have to say 78 FPS average for a 4090 at the end of its life on a AAA title just coming out is really fantastic. It’s definitely doing its job. Thank goodness for DLSS, and Frame Gen. (10 Years ago, the game would just mop the floor of your fancy high end GPU and that was that) 




During the shader compile my CPU peaked at a thirtsy 297.7 watts of juice at 5.9P/4.8E/5.0R DDR5 8600C36-49. Not sure why the font turned this color. But yeah, we all know some of these modern game shader compiles can use as much power as Cinebench lol.





Happy Birthday @Papusan 🎊

[ryan]

happy birthday @Papusan...hopefully you have a great day and take care.

[electrosoft]

3 hours ago, tps3443 said:

Tested the Black Myth WuKong benchmark. My 4090 does not particularly overclock all that well. It ran 2,895Mhz on the boost through the entire benchmark. But here goes. It seems the 4090 will get this title done pretty well maxed out at 4K. Especially with further updates and optimization I hope it gets even better! I tried to disable motion-blur and turn anti-aliasing to low, this only resulted in a +1 FPS improvement lol. So, I left it on for the below run.

These settings are how I will play the game. 

4K/DLSS@66%=Quality DLSS/ Ray Tracing=ON/ Frame Gen=ON

 

I have to say 78 FPS average for a 4090 at the end of its life on a AAA title just coming out is really fantastic. It’s definitely doing its job. Thank goodness for DLSS, and Frame Gen. (10 Years ago, the game would just mop the floor of your fancy high end GPU and that was that) 




During the shader compile my CPU peaked at a thirtsy 297.7 watts of juice at 5.9P/4.8E/5.0R DDR5 8600C36-49. Not sure why the font turned this color. But yeah, we all know some of these modern game shader compiles can use as much power as Cinebench lol.





Happy Birthday @Papusan 🎊

 

Pure 100% stock CPU and stock GPU, mem at 6000 only but tuned. IF at stock 2000. So 6fps difference? That's it? Hmmm....

 

And yeah, the shader compiles are brutal. I'm fishing through various setups on my 14900KS on the AIO to find what works best....7950X3D just shrugged it off and said, "and what?" 🤣

 

[electrosoft]

And here is some AMD 7900XTX runs on the 14900KS. I had to actually bump my Vcore up to 1.32 for 5.6/4.5/5.0 (1.2 under load)  to get it to run properly not just with shader compiles but normal use too. This thing is hungry. I think there are going to be a lot of systems that are going to crash/won't run this on launch. This is the same profile I have to run for even small OCCT and Y-cruncher testing. I can pass CB23/CB15 at 1.29 on the new bios and 1.28 (1.152v load) on the old bios. But this thing required the same profile as the ultra hungry stuff. Temps were good though! 🙂

 

This is why I like having multiple profiles. I can load up 5.9 all core auto tuned for WoW and FO76 and 5.6 as above for any heavy hitting.

 

As for AMD, er, well.... let's just say RT really isn't in the future for them with this game in any meaningful way.

 

Using the same settings as my previous run on the 4090 (and same as @tps3443😞

 

7900XTX stock + 14900KS fixed 56x/45x/50x RT ON:

 

(Note: this run was the first run and includes shader compiles data  in the HWInfo)

 

 

 

 

7900XTX stock + 14900KS fixed 56x/45x/50x  RT OFF:

 

[Prema]

Happy Birthday Brother Papu!!! 🎂

 

 

And now everyone remove Nvidia's FPS Shenanigans from the equation, disable Super Resolution (set to 100%) as well as Frame Generation and "raw-bench" Wukong in all its maxed out glory. 

 

Going first!

Here is my 4090 Notebook with 0.875v UV at 2400Mhz with 1000Mhz+ on vRAM at 4K:

 

 

 

[\SPOILER]

[Papusan]

11 hours ago, jaybee83 said:

 

aw cmon, no need to explain urself, i think its great 😄 

 

You all are so cute. Thanks to you all🙂

 

Btw. I learned something new today... bromance. Never heard this before. Dang, I really start being old😀

[Prema]

7 hours ago, Papusan said:

 

You all are so cute. Thanks to you all🙂

 

Btw. I learned something new today... bromance. Never heard this before. Dang, I really start being old😀

 

If you are still learning you are not old brother.

 

Only if we resist to learn new things we are getting old. 

 

The only thing we can't do is make new old friends!

 

Have a blessed birthday!

[Mr. Fox]

7 hours ago, Prema said:

Happy Birthday Brother Papu!!! 🎂

 

 

And now everyone remove Nvidia's FPS Shenanigans from the equation, disable Super Resolution (set to 100%) as well as Frame Generation and "raw-bench" Wukong in all its maxed out glory. 

 

Going first!

Here is my 4090 Notebook with 0.875v UV at 2400Mhz with 1000Mhz+ on vRAM at 4K:

 

  Hide contents

 

[\SPOILER]

 

8 hours ago, electrosoft said:

And here is some AMD 7900XTX runs on the 14900KS. I had to actually bump my Vcore up to 1.32 for 5.6/4.5/5.0 (1.2 under load)  to get it to run properly not just with shader compiles but normal use too. This thing is hungry. I think there are going to be a lot of systems that are going to crash/won't run this on launch. This is the same profile I have to run for even small OCCT and Y-cruncher testing. I can pass CB23/CB15 at 1.29 on the new bios and 1.28 (1.152v load) on the old bios. But this thing required the same profile as the ultra hungry stuff. Temps were good though! 🙂

 

This is why I like having multiple profiles. I can load up 5.9 all core auto tuned for WoW and FO76 and 5.6 as above for any heavy hitting.

 

As for AMD, er, well.... let's just say RT really isn't in the future for them with this game in any meaningful way.

 

Using the same settings as my previous run on the 4090 (and same as @tps3443😞

 

7900XTX stock + 14900KS fixed 56x/45x/50x RT ON:

 

(Note: this run was the first run and includes shader compiles data  in the HWInfo)

 

 

 

 

7900XTX stock + 14900KS fixed 56x/45x/50x  RT OFF:

 

The game has great graphics no matter what settings are chosen. Very good appearance. I am so glad the benchmark is free. Now I don't need to buy the game to get the benchmark. (Not a fan of the RPG genre, so it is highly unlikely that I will buy it.)

 

For comparison:

14900KF @ 59x-P, 48x-E, 52x Cache

Memory @ 8400 CL38

4090 Stock
Display @ 4K 144Hz
DLSS, RT On-Very High, Frame Generation On 

---

---

DLSS, RT On-Very High, Frame Generation Off

---

DLSS, RT OFF, Frame Generation On

---

DLSS, RT OFF, Frame Generation OFF

---

FSR, RT On-Very High, Frame Generation On

---

TSR, RT On-Very High, Frame Generation On

---

XeSS, RT On-Very High, Frame Generation On

---

DLSS SR 100%, DLSS, RT On-Very High, Frame Generation On

---

DLSS SR 100%, RT On-Very High, Frame Generation OFF

[Prema]

Now do the raw-run. Going by your results you are about to see roughly 33FPS. 😉

[tps3443]

11 hours ago, electrosoft said:

 

Pure 100% stock CPU and stock GPU, mem at 6000 only but tuned. IF at stock 2000. So 6fps difference? That's it? Hmmm....

 

And yeah, the shader compiles are brutal. I'm fishing through various setups on my 14900KS on the AIO to find what works best....7950X3D just shrugged it off and said, "and what?" 🤣

 

I mean, it’s still 8.5% and your resolution slider was 65% and not 66% 😂 But, I really don’t think it matters about CPU OC, and or RAM OC. I’m pretty sure an i3 with DDR4 3200 would probably yield a similar result as me now with my 4090. My 4090 doesn’t overclock well at all. I saw one 4090 boosting near my max OC only his was completely stock (Very sad) 😭 but you probably will beat me in this one easily @electrosoft 

I’d go ahead and do a full on OC run with the GPU OCed. I think this benchmark might come down to whose GPU has best silicon. I didn’t exactly see any action in the benchmark, it looks like a bunch of senior animal ninjas slowly walking around their retirement resort in the jungle. 😂

[Mr. Fox]

29 minutes ago, Prema said:

Now do the raw-run. Going by your results you are about to see roughly 33FPS. 😉

I am not sure what that means if you can clarify what setting to try. There is no option to turn off DLSS in the benchark, but I ran every combo I could identify with DLSS, FSR, TSR and XeSS, RT set on Very High on all.

25 minutes ago, tps3443 said:

I mean, it’s still 8.5% and your resolution slider was 65% and not 66% 😂 But, I really don’t think it matters about CPU OC, and or RAM OC. I’m pretty sure an i3 with DDR4 3200 would probably yield a similar result as me now with my 4090. My 4090 doesn’t overclock well at all. I saw one 4090 boosting near my max OC only his was completely stock (Very sad) 😭 but you probably will beat me in this one easily @electrosoft 

I’d go ahead and do a full on OC run with the GPU OCed. I think this benchmark might come down to whose GPU has best silicon. I didn’t exactly see any action in the benchmark, it looks like a bunch of senior animal ninjas slowly walking around their retirement resort in the jungle. 😂

Most games like this are very boring to me. Not enough action to hold my attention like a FPS.

 

[Prema]

6 minutes ago, Mr. Fox said:

I am not sure what that means if you can clarify what setting to try. There is no option to turn off DLSS in the benchark, but I ran every combo I could identify with DLSS, FSR, TSR and XeSS, RT set on Very High on all.

Most games like this are very boring to me. Not enough action to hold my attention like a FPS.

 

 

With everything maxed out, disable Super Resolution (set to 100%) as well as Frame Generation.

 

[Mr. Fox]

9 minutes ago, Prema said:

 

With everything maxed out, disable Super Resolution (set to 100%) as well as Frame Generation.

 

OK. Here you go, Brother. Not quite the slideshow expected but a much lower FPS.

[ryan]

High preset, FG ON, Scale 32, 4k

 

RTX 3060 UV and UC to 1725mhz

 

 

scales really well

[Prema]

5 minutes ago, Mr. Fox said:

OK. Here you go, Brother. Not quite the slideshow expected but a much lower FPS.

 

Your Frame Generation is still enabled.

Needs a restart of the app make it stick.

[tps3443]

8 minutes ago, Prema said:

 

Your Frame Generation is still enabled.

Needs a restart of the app make it stick.

It’s almost a double cheeseburger! But not quite. Still impressive for your laptop though. If we could force DLSS OFF, we’d gain much more FPS at native 100% scaling. This is essentially DLAA. 
 

[tps3443]

13 minutes ago, ryan said:

High preset, FG ON, Scale 32, 4k

 

RTX 3060 UV and UC to 1725mhz

 

 

scales really well

All for fun! I copied your settings. PS: This run only average 88% GPU usage, so it was CPU bottlenecked. 
Estimated FPS is no CPU bottleneck existed, and GPU was 99% GPU usage. 

Average FPS: 173.8 FPS
Maximum: 198 FPS
Minimum: 123 FPS
 

[Mr. Fox]

20 minutes ago, Prema said:

 

Your Frame Generation is still enabled.

Needs a restart of the app make it stick.

OK, now it is a slideshow. Not as good as your prediction.

12 minutes ago, tps3443 said:

It’s almost a double cheeseburger! But not quite. Still impressive for your laptop though. If we could force DLSS OFF, we’d gain much more FPS at native 100% scaling. This is essentially DLAA. 
 

Motion blur takes a little more VRAM, but otherwise performance is the same. With your chiller you are getting a couple of extra frames probably because the GPU is holding boost fully. I am not using the chiller and my office is 81°F (27°C) and not holding max boost clock due to that. (Core max 69.3°C and hotspot 88.9°C with the hot ambient temps.)

 

FPS identical with motion blur disabled, but VRAM slightly less used.

 

 

[tps3443]

Just now, Mr. Fox said:

OK, now it is a slideshow. Not as good as your prediction.

Motion blur takes a little more VRAM, but otherwise performance is the same. With your chiller you are getting a couple of extra frames probably because the GPU is holding boost fully. I am not using the chiller and my office is 81°F (27°C) and not holding max boost clock due to that. (Core max 69.3°C and hotspot 88.9°C with the hot ambient temps.)

 

FPS identical with motion blur disabled, but VRAM slightly less used.

 

 

My GPU is aircooled. It does not hold high boost. It is a very poor bin unfortunately. Looks to be hitting 71c max

[Mr. Fox]

1 minute ago, tps3443 said:

My GPU is aircooled. It does not hold high boost. It is a very poor bin unfortunately. Looks to be hitting 71c max

Oh, that's right. I forgot. Your ambients are probably not as high as mine are. I would imagine it would be getting even hotter than that if they were. Even if it is not the best silicon quality and won't overclock as high as some that are better, it should do everything you do in terms of gaming extremely well. More likely that it is "average" rather than "poor" quality. 

I ran all these on the Gigabyte 4090. I will try the same on the 4090 Suprim to see if there is a difference. That GPU is better bin than the Gigabyte GPU.

[tps3443]

Just now, Mr. Fox said:

Oh, that's right. I forgot. Your ambients are probably not as high as mine are. I would imagine it would be getting even hotter than that if they were.

While 2fps is very very small that is actually 10% difference. Make sure you have Rebar forced. I am also using Intel Application Optimizer as well. My GPU is running 2910 boost steady. My first run did 27fps, and I should have screen shot that one. But I tried again and it was 26fps. 

[Prema]

Speaking of Intel APO. Here are the latest drivers:

 

https://mega.nz/file/6Ml0RCgI#vqCfokXy0EqbrYLpI6ejZs-r2l-15Xhop-AnrykiVXY