Improving Cooling / Fans Upgrade In Clevo

[dude-137]

I'm looking for the ways to improve cooling on my Clevo P751TM1-G having i9-9900K + RTX 2080.

 

But the thread is useful for P75xTMx(-G)/P75xDMx(-G)/P775TMx(-G)/P870DM(-G)/X170KM-G/etc too, as the fans are physically the same in all of them.

 

The CPU in my Clevo is undervolted and configured to have the all-core frequency of 4.2GHz (sometimes having to set it to 4.1GHz).

Higher than that makes it run too hot.

Given that the CPU's default all-core frequency is 4.7GHz and can be overclocked all the way up to 5GHz, there's certainly a huge theoretical performance improvement potential.

 

Would be grateful for any recommendations / tips! :-)

 

In particular, I'm curious about the potential fans upgrade.

 

The default fans both on the CPU-side (Left) & GPU-side (Right) in P751TM1-G are:

ADDA, 6-31-P7753-100, 180925, 00DM3, DC 12V, 0.5A, 17 leaves

 

I'm quite sure there should be various different models of fans that are swap-in-compatible with the Clevo's default fans.

Has anyone upgraded their fans to more powerful ones?

If yes, could you share the model names?

 

Here's how I would prioritize power vs. noise:

1. Ideal case - a model that is both more powerful/better-cooling and quieter :-) 

2. A more powerful and better-cooling model, without caring about its noise.

3. A model that is the same as the Clevo's default fans in performance, but quieter.

 

 

PS:

Fans is the most obvious upgrade idea that comes in mind, but are there any other possible cooling-hardware update options or other ideas?

[kiemsigh]

I use water cooling

[Maro97]

what is the CPU frequency on all cores ? and how much CPU TDP . with cenabench r23 test ? 

[Maro97]

Here is my results with new nvidia driver 150w rtx 3080 with two different cpu 8700k & 9900kf with air cooling & UV 

[SuperMG]

26 minutes ago, Maro97 said:

Here is my results with new nvidia driver 150w rtx 3080 with two different cpu 8700k & 9900kf with air cooling & UV 

I get 270-280FPS with an RTX 4080 150W and i7 4900MQ bruh and 190FPS with an RTX 5000 (RTX 2080 100W) and i7 3940XM...

 

How much do you get for FurMark 1.37?

[Maro97]

I don’t benchmark all graphics cards by furmark I’m using furmark program only to test the GPU temperature and GPU hotspot for one hour . 

But for evaluating frame rates, I use 3DMark (Time Spy & Fire Strike) and the Heaven Benchmark

[Maro97]

2 minutes ago, Maro97 said:

I don’t benchmark all graphics cards by furmark I’m using furmark 

program only to test the GPU temperature and GPU hotspot for one hour . 

But for evaluating frame rates, I use 3DMark (Time Spy & Fire Strike) and the Heaven Benchmark

As you can see in the image, the GPU temperature does not exceed 65°C, and the difference between the hotspot and the GPU temperature is about 6°C, which also confirms that the thermal pads are installed with the correct thickness

[Maro97]

This is exactly what I do every time I test a new thermal paste that has recently been released on the market.

For gpu cooling I’m using a thermal grizzly duronaut. 

[SuperMG]

33 minutes ago, Maro97 said:

This is exactly what I do every time I test a new thermal paste that has recently been released on the market.

For gpu cooling I’m using a thermal grizzly duronaut. 

Not this Furmark. The Furmark 1.37 you can download at geeks3d, there's a one minute benchmark at 1080p.

 

What about 3DMark TimeSpy?

[Maro97]

3 hours ago, SuperMG said:

Not this Furmark. The Furmark 1.37 you can download at geeks3d, there's a one minute benchmark at 1080p.

 

What about 3DMark TimeSpy?

 

[SuperMG]

1 hour ago, Maro97 said:

 

I get 16000 graphics score with the 4080 150W MXM and 17700 with the 4090 130W MXM. 12400 with the RTX 4070 MXM and i7 7th gen. All running at PCIe 3.0 (expect for the 4090, at 2.0 x16)

[Maro97]

5 hours ago, SuperMG said:

Not this Furmark. The Furmark 1.37 you can download at geeks3d, there's a one minute benchmark at 1080p.

 

What about 3DMark TimeSpy?

 

1 hour ago, SuperMG said:

I get 16000 graphics score with the 4080 150W MXM and 17700 with the 4090 130W MXM. 12400 with the RTX 4070 MXM and i7 7th gen. All running at PCIe 3.0 (expect for the 4090, at 2.0 x16)

4090 with ZRT VBIOS ?

[SuperMG]

27 minutes ago, Maro97 said:

 

4090 with ZRT VBIOS ?

No ZRT VBIOS on these tests. Because the ZRT ones are at 110W max. I don't know how they're able to advertise as a 150W GPU. The performance is worser. @DynamiteZerghas a ZRT 4090 card. I only tested the vbios in a X-Vsion PCB card. I'm waiting for his answer about his ZRT PCB card.