All Activity
- Past hour
-
Alienware Graphics Amplifier with 40 Series GPU's
amirhesamsadeghpour replied to Maxware79's topic in Alienware
Go into XTU and set the Core Voltage Offset to -0.130V, then set the CPU multiplier to all-core 47x and run Time Spy again. Your CPU score should increase from around 7000 to over 10000, and the overall Time Spy score should reach around 22,000 to 23,000. - Today
-
*Official Benchmark Thread* - Post it here or it didn't happen :D
Mr. Fox replied to Mr. Fox's topic in Desktop Hardware
You made a decision based on logic rather than passion. That's the best decision, even though it doesn't include the "best product" and once you get over not having a 5090 you won't care any more and you'll know you did what was most intelligent. -
*Official Benchmark Thread* - Post it here or it didn't happen :D
tps3443 replied to Mr. Fox's topic in Desktop Hardware
Yep! I sold the Zotac 5080 last night. I had a buyer for the 5080 Astral too, and I was going to buy GTZ’s 5090 Gaming OC for $3,000. But I decided, what the heck am I doing with my life right now lol… Let me just keep the 5080 Astral and be happy with it. It’s so tempting to jump on that 5090 though. But, I just don’t really need it. This hobby can be so unhealthy at times. All for the love of PC hardware. 😀 The 5080 Astral OC is awesome. So, it really started to grow on me. And trying to be responsible has taken over. Im over here twitching man, wanting that 5090 like a crack pipe. 😂 But I know after I get it, I’ll probably feel guilty and irresponsible. -
*Official Benchmark Thread* - Post it here or it didn't happen :D
electrosoft replied to Mr. Fox's topic in Desktop Hardware
If it wasn't too much more than the Zotac, I'd keep the Astral unless you find a buyer for $1500. Hmmmm...... I'll have to give it a whirl on the 270k and see what it spits back first as I've just started testing and retuning around the 270k... JensenMagic casting "Bendoverus DropPantimus!" Since the 3000 series, each generation has contracted performance uplift wise except for the halo product. AMD needs to bring the pain and AI needs to die to get Nvidia back on track. --------------------------------------------------------------- Welp, Samsung picked the wrong person to try to get out of a 4TB 990 Pro warranty replacement due to market conditions...... -
Precision M6800 questions and upgrades
SuperMG replied to Jers6410's topic in Pro Max & Precision Mobile Workstation
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1R3nI6MCZWSWPsn-z6ZA1wsgKKMFry6e2/view?usp=drivesdk here's a reupload -
So theoretically I can remove my 1080p 144hz whole display assembly. Install this one and the eDP connector should reach/fit my RTX 2080? Will Tobii still work too? I am debating on ordering it. Always wanted 4K panel on my Area-51m. Seller hasn't replied yet
-
Area-51m 4K Panel in R1
amirhesamsadeghpour replied to ssj92's topic in Alienware 13 / 15 / 17 / 51m (2015-2020)
This 4K, 60Hz panel has a connector similar to your panel — 40-pin, 25 mm. Ask the seller to send a photo of the eDP connector -
@amirhesamsadeghpour so if I buy this, will it be plug n play? I have rtx 2080 & 1080p 144hz panel now. https://www.ebay.com/itm/326926666398?_skw=alienware+area-51m+uhd+display+assembly&itmmeta=01KTPPGA2RV1JASF7A8ERH5K4T&hash=item4c1e590a9e:g:Y5AAAeSwG0VpTBVG&itmprp=enc%3AAQALAAAA4GfYFPkwiKCW4ZNSs2u11xBX%2FnTDjq89xY7NlsI8xxPkohENCfoiysCIV3ctwYjoGlqEhdxrEQP%2BUB2FqkgWhH5j4ktV5ypn53ROzXl4wpuNp8xS19UHrqeUU39UyWge2rKe0MmDq4PsIwWYE0CEmI4fxfNOoMtdT6cQpmoxHXhs0ot5HBxSScBA9%2BxBw2xyD6KCK7z%2BDirnCkK%2BA0qKw2qVPZcDw26DpSxe2P3OEFzfDAl1W4QySPpsAx6UcIMagvS0Koc78JFY2ALBBYm6cI4Jbx25e7Bh6g4ANAxYftOw|tkp%3ABk9SR-qhwdbVZw
-
Using liquid metal does not help much in reducing temperatures. The main cause of high temperatures is the heatsink itself. No matter what you do, the i9-9900K will still reach 100°C. The best thing you can do is undervolt the CPU. Just go into Intel XTU and set the core voltage offset to around -0.120 to -0.130, then set the all-core multiplier to 47x or 48x. After that, run a benchmark and check the results. You should see lower temperatures and noticeably different CPU performance. If the system is stable, you can also try going up to -0.140 offset. My previous 9900K, using the same settings, achieved a score of 10,466 in the Time Spy benchmark.
-
Alienware M18x r2 3630qm 16gb 2x7970m 80gb ssd 500gb hdd
kela-slk replied to kela-slk's topic in Notebooks and Desktops
laptop 3740qm+16g ram+256ssd+m4000m 4gb single or can insert factory 1 *gtx675m + secondary heatsink from gtx675m + sli bridge, 240w ac, + battery =400$ nebula red. -
Using liquid metal does not help much in reducing temperatures. The main cause of high temperatures is the heatsink itself. No matter what you do, the i9-9900K will still reach 100°C. The best thing you can do is undervolt the CPU. Just go into Intel XTU and set the core voltage offset to around -0.120 to -0.130, then set the all-core multiplier to 47x or 48x. After that, run a benchmark and check the results. You should see lower temperatures and noticeably different CPU performance.
-
spamholers joined the community
-
By sharing your system specifications, we can work together to find the best possible configuration. I can also suggest stable tuning settings so you can get the maximum performance out of your system.
-
- area-51m r1
- area-51m
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
I’m waiting for you to improve your CPU score in Time Spy and send me a really good record so I can enjoy seeing the result. If I had an RTX 5080 right now, I would definitely set an incredible benchmark record with this laptop. Unfortunately, my card is only a 3080 Ti. Come on, let’s make an impressive record with the 5080.
- 2 replies
-
- area-51m r1
- 9900ks
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
The BIOS versions that allow you to set memory frequencies higher than 2666 MHz are as follows: BIOS 1.1, 1.3.2, 1.5, and 1.7.3. Newer BIOS versions have more restrictions and allow fewer modifications through RU. If you want, I can also send you the best settings for 2933 MHz, with the lowest timings that are both fully stable and deliver excellent performance. In fact, 2933 MHz with CL17 timings performs better than 3200 MHz with CL20 or CL22 timings.
-
Uhm, I am terribly sorry for committing the dreadful crime of spreading misinformation😅 I WAS INITIALLY running 82.07.8D.00.15 with non a non-DC screen, but at some point (maybe a year ago) I flashed a different vbios with an applied overclock (1071 to 1306 ) onto my M1000M - version 82.07.97.00.04, since I was too lazy as to mod my own bios... Then two months ago, I got hold of a DC screen, installed that and it worked right of the bat with 82.07.97.00.04 - I hadn't even thought about the different vbios versions... In device manager, screen identifies as PnP-Monitor (Standard) Hardware ID MONITOR\LGD0220 No specific mobile registry overrides active as far as I can see. The 460.89 driver was installed by using NVcleanstall, which eliminates the need for manual inf modding: https://www.techpowerup.com/download/techpowerup-nvcleanstall/ GM107_82.07.97.00.04.rom
- 3 replies
-
- hp-elitebook-8570w
- quadro-m1000m
- (and 8 more)
-
A video on how the PWM module controls the brightness (video quality is low and the flicker at the end wasn't visible in real life): https://drive.google.com/file/d/1pc26yv-KfplCYKkyqWoC8NvCF2inLdIQ/view I also have another video (low quality...) without flickering but it's so blurry thanks to the autofocus that I can't disable...
-
All parts working! The trackpad on the new palmrest assembly is miles better in responsiveness too which is ace. going to get drivers working, do some testing and install windows 10 LTSC.
-
HaKu - Mono No Aware Because.....its a Japanese tongue twister
-
Liquid Metal on the 9900k IHS AREA51m
2CPU replied to i.bakar's topic in Alienware 13 / 15 / 17 / 51m (2015-2020)
What size shim? Where can I find it? -
0C 80 but you got methods to recover your NVRAM/BIOS chip right? 0C80 = 3200, 0xA63 as 80 and 0xA64 as 0C Dude above knows way more settings that me but like I could not get the CL settings to be "hard coded" IMO the DIMMs have SPD read values of CL. Still no direct reply to this: ✅ Memory Profile: MEMORY PROFILE 0XA65 → 01 ✅ Additional Overclocking: 0X93F → 0B
-
*Official Benchmark Thread* - Post it here or it didn't happen :D
tps3443 replied to Mr. Fox's topic in Desktop Hardware
These 5060Ti’s are INSANITY. This one can run +525 on the core and does not give trouble until +550. -
Wow, having someone with the exact same hardware combination reply is massive! Thank you. Knowing that the M1000M + 82.07.8D.00.15 + DreamColor matrix works perfectly for you isolates this completely to a driver branch or OS handoff issue. I am currently running a much newer driver branch on Windows 11, which I manually modded. Before I attempt to roll back to the 460.89 branch, I would love to verify a couple of quick Registry/INF details from your working system to see where the communication breakdown is happening on mine: Device Manager Identification: On your LTSC setup, does your DreamColor panel show up under Monitors as a "Generic PnP Monitor" linked to MONITOR\LGD0220, or does it map to a specific HP/DreamColor hardware ID wrapper (like HPQ3201)? Registry Injection: If you check your active display registry path under: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Class\{4d36e968-e325-11ce-bfc1-08002be10318}\0000 Are there any specific mobile registry overrides active (such as Mobile_Registers, RM_I2cWriteRegistry, or target panel power bitmasks)? If you happen to still have the modified .inf file or the specific setup folder you used to deploy 460.89 on your machine, would you be open to sharing it? I'd love to compare the section blocks to see if your INF maps the eDP/panel power scaling differently than the newer driver branches do. Thanks again!
- 3 replies
-
- hp-elitebook-8570w
- quadro-m1000m
- (and 8 more)