-
Posts
2,121 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
88
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by tps3443
-
*Official Benchmark Thread* - Post it here or it didn't happen :D
tps3443 replied to Mr. Fox's topic in Desktop Hardware
This is how I am running my system right now. This is not a golden chip by any means. But I can do 5.7Ghz with a 6.0Ghz boost on (4) cores. I also have the E-Cores at 4.5Ghz, with a 4.7Ghz ring. Stable as a rock like this in anything! DDR5 is at 7800 C38 running very well like this. This is the fastest I can stabilize for daily usage. This CPU will do until my SP120+ chip comes through 😈 -
*Official Benchmark Thread* - Post it here or it didn't happen :D
tps3443 replied to Mr. Fox's topic in Desktop Hardware
Just so we know our P-Core SP ratings is all. A lot of people have no idea, and only have a Force2 rating. So I decided to come up with a chart for it so people know. -
*Official Benchmark Thread* - Post it here or it didn't happen :D
tps3443 replied to Mr. Fox's topic in Desktop Hardware
With all of the CPU samples I have tested, and also looking at others Force 2 and Asus SP rating. I have created a MSI FORCE 2 CONVERSION for Asus P-Core SP rating. This is going by only “P-Core SP rating” P-Core SP124= Force 109 P-Core SP123= Force 112 P-Core SP122= Force 115 P-Core SP121= Force 118 P-Core SP120= Force 121 P-Core SP119= Force 124 P-Core SP118= Force 127 P-Core SP117= Force 130 P-Core SP116= Force 133 P-Core SP115= Force 136 P-Core SP114= Force 139 P-Core SP113= Force 142 P-Core SP112= Force 145 P-Core SP111= Force 148 P-Core SP110= Force 151 P-Core SP109= Force 154 P-Core SP108= Force 157 P-Core SP107= Force 160 P-Core SP106= Force 163 I hope this helps!! I think the chart is accurate as it directly correlates with my tested CPU’s and other people CPU’s too! -
*Official Benchmark Thread* - Post it here or it didn't happen :D
tps3443 replied to Mr. Fox's topic in Desktop Hardware
This is absolutely incredible!!! @Mr. Fox I would return the Corsair 7200 sticks, grab some Hynix A-Die green sticks! -
*Official Benchmark Thread* - Post it here or it didn't happen :D
tps3443 replied to Mr. Fox's topic in Desktop Hardware
Well, you have really good Hynix M-Die memory, which is kinda hard to beat! In my case, I was coming from DDR5 6000Mhz which seemed a little touchy at 6600Mhz+ and not the best timings. But now I am running my Hynix A-die DDR5 at 7800Mhz. So it was a real solid improvement to bandwidth and latency. I was able to sell my other memory, so I own this Team Group 7200 ram for $250 which isn’t all that bad. -
*Official Benchmark Thread* - Post it here or it didn't happen :D
tps3443 replied to Mr. Fox's topic in Desktop Hardware
I didn’t realize the Z690 Asus boards gave you a IMC rating at all. -
*Official Benchmark Thread* - Post it here or it didn't happen :D
tps3443 replied to Mr. Fox's topic in Desktop Hardware
Looks like you finally grabbed some Hynix A die. That’s very cool! I’m curious to see where you can take it while on that Z690 Dark. So far I’m running mine at 7800 C36. The 13900K I’m using is not anything special with a fairly high Force 143 rating, but for some reason it stabilizes this DDR5 7800 very well. How is the Aqua Computer waterblock? It looks very nice! -
*Official Benchmark Thread* - Post it here or it didn't happen :D
tps3443 replied to Mr. Fox's topic in Desktop Hardware
Yeah for now I’m just having fun testing CPU’s. It really is extremely fun though. I have discovered that the MSI Force2 rating is legit, and it doesn’t lie. It will save you a lot of time on testing. Even though I have tested each CPU independently. I’ve tested: 13900KF(X238L435)Force134 Newegg Bios VID 0.959V 13900K X241M665 Force 124 Bestbuy Bios VID 0.927V 13900KF X238L101 Force 149 Newegg Bios VID 0.989V 13900K X241M888 Force 143 Bestbuy Bios VID 0.972V The lower the better 100%. This motherboard doesn’t lie lol. I hope MSI Improves on this more. -
*Official Benchmark Thread* - Post it here or it didn't happen :D
tps3443 replied to Mr. Fox's topic in Desktop Hardware
Yeah for now I’m just having fun testing CPU’s. It really is extremely fun though. I have discovered that the MSI Force2 rating is legit, and it doesn’t lie. It will save you a lot of time on testing. Even though I have tested each CPU independently. It’s crazy how some chips are really super good or super bad. I’ve tested: 13900KF(X238L435)Force134 Newegg Bios VID 0.959V 13900K X241M665 Force 124 Bestbuy Bios VID 0.927V 13900KF X238L101 Force 149 Newegg Bios VID 0.989V 13900K X241M888 Force 143 Bestbuy Bios VID 0.972V The lower the better 100%. This motherboard doesn’t lie lol. I hope MSI Improves on this more. -
*Official Benchmark Thread* - Post it here or it didn't happen :D
tps3443 replied to Mr. Fox's topic in Desktop Hardware
I’m sorry, I’ve been extreme busy with work stresses and testing CPU’s in general. I’ve sold the processor X241M860 and it’s going out today. It was an incredible sample, and it has really set the bar for trying to find one even better. I don’t even have those benchmarks you mentioned, but I was planning on downloading them when I had time. I was planning on keeping Batch X241M860 I had found my chip lol. But people message me with stuff like “Name your price/Not kidding” etc. And I end up falling right in hook line and sinker Anyways, my newest sample isn’t as good. But it’s still an okay performer at just slightly above average. -
*Official Benchmark Thread* - Post it here or it didn't happen :D
tps3443 replied to Mr. Fox's topic in Desktop Hardware
I’m testing my 4th 13900K today. Batch X241M888. This chip is a Force2 =143 Nothing spectacular, but maybe average or slightly above average. The ring is average, the E-Cores are average x45 maybe x46 and that’s it, and it loves to use power if you’re clocking it high on all cores lol! But after all of that! It’s still a dang 13900K, and I have it setup at 5.7Ghz on (8) cores, 6.0Ghz (4) Cores, and 6.2Ghz on (2) cores. YES! 6.2Ghz on (2) cores even this chip. While the VID’s may be slightly through the roof lol, it’s still a very reasonable CPU I have the LLC maxed out at LLC #8 so load voltages drop down drastically. I can definitely rock this everyday, or anyone could honestly. I mean, they all perform within 1-3% anyways regardless of how good that SP rating is haha. (This chip ain’t nothing like my other chip though, but it’s still a very solid chip and it surprises me how great just an average 13900K really is) I’m giving all the average guys out there with regular 13900K’s some love today!! These CPU’s are really great regardless how high or low a number may be. -
*Official Benchmark Thread* - Post it here or it didn't happen :D
tps3443 replied to Mr. Fox's topic in Desktop Hardware
I think it was because it’s just the XMP 7200 profile so it holds out a little better under higher heat. When I run 7600 it’s much more sensitive! I’ve gotta stay under 42C -
*Official Benchmark Thread* - Post it here or it didn't happen :D
tps3443 replied to Mr. Fox's topic in Desktop Hardware
Crazy how HOT DDR5 gets! I ran my DDR5@7200XMP CL34 super high tREFI@262,000 tFAW@16 only 1.400V This was just a optimized XMP profile. I ran full 32GB coverage with 32 iterations of HCI Memtest (NO FANS lol) It finally gave out with a BSOD at 59C memory temps! Too hot to hold your hand on. -
*Official Benchmark Thread* - Post it here or it didn't happen :D
tps3443 replied to Mr. Fox's topic in Desktop Hardware
Z690 Dark for sale on the OC forums for $350! That’s tempting, but I’m actually good. I’ve already got my 13900K and DDR5 dialed in very well on my Unify-X. -
*Official Benchmark Thread* - Post it here or it didn't happen :D
tps3443 replied to Mr. Fox's topic in Desktop Hardware
You can run CPU VDDQ up to 1.5V for daily. And upwards of 1.6V for benching is perfectly fine. This is essentially just a signal voltage, so it won’t harm anything. CPU VDD2 is the CPU IMC And it can be ran at 1.400V daily, or about 1.450V for benching. I personally do not exceed 1.400V on this one. Hope this helps. -
*Official Benchmark Thread* - Post it here or it didn't happen :D
tps3443 replied to Mr. Fox's topic in Desktop Hardware
Man, that is pretty much Heavy OCed 2080Ti performance “Just about” this tells me at 1080P/1440P they probably really would perform equivalent. Now I’m seeing why you kept it. Also, that physics score is monstrous from a 12900KS. Has me wondering what a 13900K does in this situation. -
*Official Benchmark Thread* - Post it here or it didn't happen :D
tps3443 replied to Mr. Fox's topic in Desktop Hardware
I have been tuning a little on my new 13900K. And it is something for sure! PS: CEN is messaging me again. (Not kidding) (AUTO Voltage) (Auto LLC) (P-Cores) 62,62,61,61,58,58,58,58 (E-Cores) 47,47,47,47,47,47,47,47 47,47,47,47,47,47,47,47 (Ring/Cache) @5,100Mhz -
*Official Benchmark Thread* - Post it here or it didn't happen :D
tps3443 replied to Mr. Fox's topic in Desktop Hardware
Geekbench is excellent for triggering a failure on a high boosting single cores, you’ll lock up in seconds. Which was the only thing I was really worried about. But I was just running Geekbench to see what it scored primarily. If I run Prime 95 non-avx, or Cinebench it’s just gonna clock down to 5.8 or 5.9 and chug right along no problem at those lower clocks. What I have been testing is maxing out all the boost ratios, and making sure those super high boosting cores are stable and steady and boosting as high as I can run them. And so far after hours and hours of testing, I have settled on 62,62,61,61,58,58 for the P-Cores with a X51 cache, and 45 E-Cores. I am actually using an adaptive VF curve voltage. This chip has got some silicon that’s for sure! I got my 13900KS already. 😎 -
*Official Benchmark Thread* - Post it here or it didn't happen :D
tps3443 replied to Mr. Fox's topic in Desktop Hardware
Testing 6.2Ghz Boost with 5.9Ghz all core UPDATE, this is my new daily profile. I see a lot of people running this test, so here goes. Geekbench 5. Yes, its SUPER STABLE! I love it. This is a Pre- 13900KS all the way. CRAZY FAST single threaded performance, that's for sure. -
*Official Benchmark Thread* - Post it here or it didn't happen :D
tps3443 replied to Mr. Fox's topic in Desktop Hardware
It’s just 6.1Ghz on a (2) core load. It’s just flipping between the cores that are loaded. 5.8Ghz all core load. But yes I can run the test. I’ll download it and report back. -
*Official Benchmark Thread* - Post it here or it didn't happen :D
tps3443 replied to Mr. Fox's topic in Desktop Hardware
I’m not running 6.1 all cores. I’m only running 6.1 boost on (2) cores. As for the E-Cores, I have not even touched them yet. I’ve been working, and I’ve only had a little time here and there to tinker with the cpu. -
*Official Benchmark Thread* - Post it here or it didn't happen :D
tps3443 replied to Mr. Fox's topic in Desktop Hardware
Youtube will fix the quality momentarily, it’s always bad right after it’s uploaded. I have not touched the E-Cores yet. I just set 45 E-Cores, and 51 cache and left it. I have not tried to go past 45. -
*Official Benchmark Thread* - Post it here or it didn't happen :D
tps3443 replied to Mr. Fox's topic in Desktop Hardware
Playing with new daily settings! -
*Official Benchmark Thread* - Post it here or it didn't happen :D
tps3443 replied to Mr. Fox's topic in Desktop Hardware
I haven’t really compared this CryoFuze stuff to anything yet though. Brand new 13900K, with a brand new paste, and it just runs really cool on my setup. I could potentially swap it out with Kryonaut Extreme pink stuff, and possibly see a little temp reduction lol. -
*Official Benchmark Thread* - Post it here or it didn't happen :D
tps3443 replied to Mr. Fox's topic in Desktop Hardware
I spread the paste really thin on the CPU IHS first, then I install the CPU in the socket. Press down on my waterblock in the very center, then I lightly turn thumbscrews until they just stop, then cross snug pattern, then cross snug firmly again. Never used MX5 before.