*Official Benchmark Thread* - Post it here or it didn't happen :D

[tps3443]

13 hours ago, Mr. Fox said:

You should be getting more than 44K in CBR23 at those clock speeds. Like 46.5 or 47K.

This is with dynamic oc switching (MSI version of it) with my 4585PX.

Here is with the Apex with DOS enabled.

I’ll mess with it some more. When I enabled high priority it does hit 46K at least. Not sure if that helps, as I’m just using a stock retail Win11 OS. Anyways, I’m messing with ram tuning right now. I just let the chip run stock for the most part trying to memorize and learn AMD things.

 

Good news is my ram booted right up at 6000 CL26-36-36-36-96@1.435V. 

My motherboard seems to be responding a little bit better as time has gone on. It might be okay after all. 
 

I see training and posting with high tREFI is much easier with more VDD/VDDQ voltage. So, like 6000c30 with 65K tREFI won’t post with 1.400v VDD/VDDQ. But it will post with 1.435v VDD/VDDQ. I know how DDR5 was with Intel, and it was heavily dependent on your IMC quality. Like one CPU may do 6000c30@1.35v and another CPU wants 6000c30@1.400v. That’s what I learned with Intel anyways, the CPU IMC quality determines how much voltage your DDR5 rams would need. This made it incredibly difficult to bin ram sticks in my opinion. Because an amazing IMC would make average DDR5 look like super sticks or something.
 

 

 

[electrosoft]

Ultimate shootout with bonus crapping on Jufus's testing methodology (and others):

 

 

 

 

4k gaming really shows any of the CPUs finely tuned are on average close to each other capping out even a 5090 and the 10 game average when tuned it is a wash overall except for those rare titles that love X3D enough to make a meaningful difference even at 4k.

 

His results are basically in line with my testing even harking back to 7800X3D vs 13900KS and on but as always YMMV.

 

I would say 1080p is a portend of future 4k potential removing the GPU as a potential bottleneck with more powerful GPUs coming down the pipeline but the problem is X3D cache saturation diminishes as resolution lowers so you can't just predict future gains using a more powerful GPU at higher resolutions (thus lowering or removing the GPU as a bottleneck) using 1080p straight forward...

 

...either way bring on the bLLC!

 

270k is an absolute banger of a CPU and with the drastic cuts to MB pricing the real challenge is tracking down a set of decently priced 8000+ sticks either as sold or a 6000+ kit and OC'ing it.

 

-------------------------------

 

Shockingly, those same two $5300 Gigabyte 5090 Infinity GPUs are still in stock at our local Microcenter....

 

As a matter of fact, they're still in stock at all 10 Microcenters within a 150 mile radius too....

 

🤣