PHVM_BR

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Nvidia-RTX-A5500-debut-Dell-Precision-7670-Performance-workstation-review.671474.0.html

I prefer to wait another generation, hoping for a more mature and better resolved project. My disappointment is not only with the undersized cooling system, I also didn't like having to choose CAMM memory to get more than 64gb... I believe that the next generation will reuse the current design, but with necessary refinements, in addition to the gains with Raptor Lake and RTX 4000... I love the 7540, it has served me very well for the last 3 years, but I made a mistake in choosing the configuration. I opted for i7-9750H to reduce costs and only 6 cores are weighing on my activities. If I had opted for i9-9880H I believe I could have kept it for another 2 or 3 years...

I planned to buy a 7670 to replace my Precision 7540 this holiday season. I gave up.... So I researched about P16 and Fury 16 G9... I'll wait another year!

Parece que o TGP no Fury 16 G9 permanecerá muito limitado como nas gerações anteriores. Além disso, a potência a longo prazo é baixa para aproveitar o potencial dos processadores HX. Cinebench R23 = 18680: laptopmedia.com/processor/intel-core-i7-12800hx/ https://laptopmedia.com/review/hp-zbook-fury-16-g9/#gpu-options

I tested the 7540 connected via Thunderbolt port to the dell P2723QE monitor with PD of 90W and it works! I believe Dell has blocked the PD of the 7540's USB-C ports for use with 3rd party chargers...

I repasted with NT-H2 and my Precision 7540 had fantastic thermal gains....for about 3 weeks. NT-H2 is not very viscous and with constant use at high performance has a tendency to drain into laptops. The heatsink pressure is much lower than on desktops and the probability of the pump-out effect occurring is very high. Originally, without undervolt, in multicore CBR23 the i7-9750H hit 100°C at 90W with 3.6/3.7GHz on all cores. With Noctua it dropped to ~94°C at 90W with 3.8/3.9GHz, without thermal throttling. After 15/20 days the performance degraded at 75W at ~94°C. I currently use Thermalright TFX and the performance remains the same after 2 months, almost equal to noctua for the first few days. This is CPU related. For GPU Noctua works very well due to lower temperatures. No flow occurred and performance didn't degrade.

This is exactly what is to be expected for the Precision 7770. 157W starting and 85W sustained. I intend to change my Precision by the end of this year and I liked the P16. My preference would be for the 7670, but this CAMM module and in the future only 2 SODIMM modules, will probably make me go to the competition.

Very good! For this score the P16 must have ~110W sustained on the CBR23? What is the TGP of the A4500? 115+15W? Are the temps good?

where is the information from?

How many Watts sustained in factory default? My 7540 sustains up to 90W with Thermalright TFX (undervolt off) at ~93°C and ambient at ~21°C. New and with original thermal paste it was 75W at the same temperatures... Aaron's unit certainly has a problem. His Cinebench score is lower than a Precision 3571 with (6+8)c/20t.

It is not expected to reach the performance of X17, GE67/77, etc...these are gaming machines focused on high performance. This 7770 is expected to deliver consistent good performance, a more reliable machine. Precision has always prized stability, reliability with good performance. I'm convinced that Aaron's unit has a problem because at multicore full load his CPU can't even reach the value of PL1. The expected would be to reach something between 115 and 157W (PL2) - depending on the cooling capacity - for a few seconds before throttling and staying at 85W (PL1) with a temperature below 100°C.

Aaron44126, the multicore full load performance has already shown, it would be interesting to check the maximum capacity of the system when CPU and GPU are demanded to the maximum. If possible I suggest following Jarrod and simultaneously running cpu stress test on Aida64 and Heaven. Check temps/clocks/power of both. Thanks!

I saw this review...but I don't even consider the possibility of the gpu being limited to 55W when in full load simultaneously with the CPU. It's certainly a bug to be fixed with an update. His at least has a sustained power of 85W with the i9 in multicore full load. Impossible for dell to have done all this internal update to get these results. I have a Precision 7540 and I get 75W sustained on the CPU (i7-9750H) and 60W on the GPU (T2000) running Prime95 and Furmark simultaneously.

It's not a matter of squeezing the most out of the hardware, looking for every point in benchmarks, but the performance of your 7770 in both CPU and GPU is below acceptable. If this is the standard the new 7770 represents a downgrade in cooling capacity compared to the 7740/7750/7760. On the CBR23 the score, sustained power and temperatures are horrible. A performance level close to that achieved by the GT77 was never expected, but an acceptable performance for this precision would be able to maintain the 85W of the PL1 without thermal throttling reaching 17500-18000 on the CBR23. On Time Spy its CPU score is super low, at the level of an average i7-11800H. The 3080Ti is also low, with a maximum TGP of 150W its score should be ~12000. My guess is your unit has a problem with either misapplying thermal paste or poor contact heatsink... Otherwise, why a high-end i9 HX + high end dGPU if the system can't extract minimally decent performance for the hardware?

I contacted support and they don't know if it's a lock done on purpose by Dell, if it's a problem or something else. They simply claim that Dell cannot guarantee the performance of third-party products. Luckily I have a P2723QE monitor with USB-C Hub with 90W Power Delivery. I'm on a business trip and as soon as I get back to the office I'm going to test it on a fully Dell system. At most I have faulty Tunderbolt ports and I will get a 7670 in return... Thank you very much for your attention Aaron44126!

Hey guys, I bought a 100W USB-C GaN charger with the intention of using it in my Precision 7540 when I'm out of the office, obviously for lighter tasks...I've tried everything and I can't charge the laptop through the Thunderbolt ports. Windows informs that the system is not being charged and in another message it informs that a charger of at least 90W is necessary for this to work. Well, I've already tested this GaN on two Inspirons and it worked perfectly delivering all the machines' performance. Are the Precision 7540's Thunderbolt ports limited for charging via third-party chargers? I have a problem? I often use both USB-C ports with flash drives, external hard drives, smartphones, etc... Sorry for my english, it's not my native language.