-
Posts
1,561 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
55
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by tps3443
-
*Official Benchmark Thread* - Post it here or it didn't happen :D
tps3443 replied to Mr. Fox's topic in Desktop Hardware
Nvidia is a jerk, so no they probably won’t add it… lol. I have a heavy OCed 3090, and I’m gonna say it’s probably only a little slower than a 4080 in situations without DLSS. The 3090’s all have the hardware on board for frame regeneration. Maybe Nvidia would add this after the 4000 series has already been around for a little while. But if they added it now, I think little reason would make a 4080 look desirable afterwards. I wish they would though. -
*Official Benchmark Thread* - Post it here or it didn't happen :D
tps3443 replied to Mr. Fox's topic in Desktop Hardware
My journey is finally complete! I have a golden chip, and its setup exactly how I want it. 318 watts max through R23 6.0Ghz P-Cores, 4.7Ghz E-Cores, 5.1Ghz Ring This is a STRAIGHT 6, just like the old days! 😁 -
*Official Benchmark Thread* - Post it here or it didn't happen :D
tps3443 replied to Mr. Fox's topic in Desktop Hardware
6.0Ghz P-Cores "Auto voltage" 4.8Ghz E-Cores "Auto voltage" 5.1Ghz Ring DDR5 7400 C34 (Optimized Timings/RTL's) @1.395V in bios. 1.050V SA Voltage 1.250V VDD2 1.250V VDDQ (32) iterations of HCI Memtest. This is really a nice gaming profile right here. Yes 4.8Ghz on the E-Cores loses massive amount of efficiency. But its stable. And it is a MONSTER. I am heavily limited by my DDR5 and Unify-X. I wish I just had some Greensticks. I can stabilize DDR5 7600-7800 for games, but it's not really stable though. My IMC seems to be amazing, because I can reduce supporting CPU IMC voltages quite a bit. I can probably go below 1.00V on the SA, and 1.200V on the VDDQ/VDD2 voltages. -
*Official Benchmark Thread* - Post it here or it didn't happen :D
tps3443 replied to Mr. Fox's topic in Desktop Hardware
I have the newest revision coming. Someone was running it on their 13900K and they broke the chip apparently via accidental SMD removal, and they sold me the supercool DD block. I had to pay $150 shipped for it though 😞. They are hard to come by in todays time. The guy making them is backed up with orders. I’m running 6.0P, 4.8E, 5.1R on my current CPU for gaming work etc and hoping this will tame down temps during some heavier benches. -
*Official Benchmark Thread* - Post it here or it didn't happen :D
tps3443 replied to Mr. Fox's topic in Desktop Hardware
I lapped the IHS on my 13900K. And saw roughly 3-5C reduction on the cores. Most likely I am going to run the “Super cool” direct die setup like all these other guys are running though. Anyone have a Supercool direct die they’d be willing to sell? I have heard that 12th gen and 13th gen are the same. -
*Official Benchmark Thread* - Post it here or it didn't happen :D
tps3443 replied to Mr. Fox's topic in Desktop Hardware
Check out this 13900K. This chip is funny that's for sure! Okay so it runs abnormally hot. 10C hotter than my last 13900K at the same power levels. So, I am thinking bad TIM, or bad IHS flatness for sure. However, even with how warm it is running it's still a BOSS! It is really a flipping crazy good chip. 5.9Ghz P-Cores, 4.7Ghz E-Cores, and 5.1Ghz Ring. 1.315V set in bios. -
*Official Benchmark Thread* - Post it here or it didn't happen :D
tps3443 replied to Mr. Fox's topic in Desktop Hardware
That’s how GPU launches are nowadays. Only CPU launches are not paper launches. -
*Official Benchmark Thread* - Post it here or it didn't happen :D
tps3443 replied to Mr. Fox's topic in Desktop Hardware
That’s straight up bonkers right there man. Can’t believe the ZOTAC 4090 is doing that well. -
*Official Benchmark Thread* - Post it here or it didn't happen :D
tps3443 replied to Mr. Fox's topic in Desktop Hardware
New 13900K allows 6.3Ghz single threaded!! Woot woot!! 6.3Ghz on (4)) cores is very solid. I am still tuning it up though. 5.7Ghz and 5.8Ghz all cores are very efficient so far. I have maximum V-Droop set, so under a heavy R23 load it drops down to around 1.23V making an overclock like this possible. Wanna hear something crazy? This chip is an SP121 P-Core CPU, but it’s also a Force 135 😳 the idle bios voltage is drastically higher than my last chip. So, I’m thinking that’s where the force rating comes in to play from. My Force 124 could never run 6.3Ghz on a single core without an immediate BSOD in windows let alone (2) cores or (3) cores or more. After getting this chip, I no longer trust the MSI FORCE2 rating. My very first chip was a Force 134 and I feel like that CPU was probably a very high SP rating. Moral of the story. Test your CPU’s manually!! Of (5) 13900K’s this is the only chip that can run 6.3Ghz+ reliably. But it has a Force rating of 135 lol. -
*Official Benchmark Thread* - Post it here or it didn't happen :D
tps3443 replied to Mr. Fox's topic in Desktop Hardware
SP110 13900K is here and running in my rig. chip is SP121 P-Cores, and SP88 E-Cores. I’m working at the moment, and just running the chip stock. I’ll report back later how it performs. -
*Official Benchmark Thread* - Post it here or it didn't happen :D
tps3443 replied to Mr. Fox's topic in Desktop Hardware
That’s cool. W-3175X rules! I was tempted numerous times over getting one. EVGA Dark SR3 motherboard is glorious. They don’t exactly make sense now, with how fast the 13900K is. But it’s good Intel is putting some distance between mainstream high end platforms and their next HEDT Sapphire rapids platform. Because X299 and Z270/Z390/Z490 were always being compared to each other in gaming like it was even relevant.. Which it wasn’t. -
*Official Benchmark Thread* - Post it here or it didn't happen :D
tps3443 replied to Mr. Fox's topic in Desktop Hardware
I mean, it would be awesome to see something like that. Imagine a 13980XE only with Octa channel DDR5 and 32 P-Cores and 64 E-Cores that would be insanely powerful!!! 😎 People pick on the E-Cores. But I’m digging it, especially now they are so FAST! The 13900K and Z690 has been the smoothest platform I’ve ever owned or ran in my life, not to mention it’s not crazy expensive. Especially when it comes to gaming and working and doing multiple different things at once. I feel like the e-cores help keep windows 11 and its bloatmaster background task running okay. And my games or primary task run butter smooth on P-Cores simultaneously. This is something my 11900K couldn’t do. You would get those occasional skips and pops, primarily because the CPU was all tied up in running what I was doing at the moment. So if anything happen in the background the chip could stumble even if only for a moment. But it was a distraction. I guess it’s kind of like Satellite TV. They say 99% reliable. Well that 1% is still 14+ minutes where it’s not working in a day lol. 13900K is smooth and reliable 100% of the time. -
*Official Benchmark Thread* - Post it here or it didn't happen :D
tps3443 replied to Mr. Fox's topic in Desktop Hardware
It’s gonna be expensive, I know that! Probably $1,000-$3,000 dollar processors and $600-$1,800 dollar motherboards lol. -
*Official Benchmark Thread* - Post it here or it didn't happen :D
tps3443 replied to Mr. Fox's topic in Desktop Hardware
So the 7900XTX is only 11% faster than my 3090 in Timespy Extreme? 🧐 4090 or bust! -
*Official Benchmark Thread* - Post it here or it didn't happen :D
tps3443 replied to Mr. Fox's topic in Desktop Hardware
I’ve never seen my 13900K’s hit 5.7Ghz all cores without overclocking. So, I’m guessing a 13900KS would never hit 5.8 right? Their normal all core boost is identical? I may give +1 or +2 TVB a try with my new 13900K. Ideally I’d like to run 6.0-6.4 with it. Or at least 5.9-6.3. -
*Official Benchmark Thread* - Post it here or it didn't happen :D
tps3443 replied to Mr. Fox's topic in Desktop Hardware
13900KS performance leaks https://videocardz.com/newz/intel-core-i9-13900ks-is-10-faster-than-i9-12900ks-in-first-single-core-synthetic-tests -
*Official Benchmark Thread* - Post it here or it didn't happen :D
tps3443 replied to Mr. Fox's topic in Desktop Hardware
Are you upgrading from a 3090Ti Supreme X? -
*Official Benchmark Thread* - Post it here or it didn't happen :D
tps3443 replied to Mr. Fox's topic in Desktop Hardware
Force 165 wouldn’t be that bad for a 12900KS. Some 13900K’s are Force 160’s. Average seems to be Force 149 for 13900K. -
*Official Benchmark Thread* - Post it here or it didn't happen :D
tps3443 replied to Mr. Fox's topic in Desktop Hardware
My 13900K with SP121 P-Cores finally made it out of Postal customs and it’s roaming the nation as we speak making its way to home. 🤪 13900KS leaked specs look weak to me 🧐... It has the same all core frequency’s as a normal 13900K? And the same ring frequency? And the same E-Core frequencies too? I’m guessing the 13900KS is probably SP110+ P-Core CPU. 13900KS (2) core turbo 6.0Ghz 13900KS all core boost 5.4Ghz 13900KS Base frequency 3.2Ghz I have a normal “run of the mill” 13900K right now (Force 143). And it’s hammering down 5.8-6.0Ghz P-Cores, with 4.5Ghz E-Cores, and a whopping 5.2Ghz BIG DOG OC on the ring 🤣! “This is with my chiller off” 😎 These chips are all flipping awesome regardless of the bin. -
*Official Benchmark Thread* - Post it here or it didn't happen :D
tps3443 replied to Mr. Fox's topic in Desktop Hardware
This 3090KP is plenty powerful, so getting a 4080 is a silly move for me. I’ll probably get (2) A770’s instead. Then I’ll have (2) gaming PC’s. Plus, I want some A770’s to help support the cause against Nvidia lol. I’d rather give my money to Intel lol. -
*Official Benchmark Thread* - Post it here or it didn't happen :D
tps3443 replied to Mr. Fox's topic in Desktop Hardware
AWESOME!!! wait, Limit (20) per customer??!! What is wrong with Newegg.. My gosh they are cold. They must be pro scalper huh? I may finally let go of my EVGA 3090 KP HC and buy (2) of the Arc 770’s. Then I could run one in my system, and put the other in my 11900K system and play games with my son! -
*Official Benchmark Thread* - Post it here or it didn't happen :D
tps3443 replied to Mr. Fox's topic in Desktop Hardware
On another note it’s kinda funny how we pick on the 4080 for being $1,200. Because in reality it’s 25% cheaper than a 4090 while only being 29% slower too. That’s not bad. We are literally getting exactly what we pay for. Now it’s about to become even cheaper! -
*Official Benchmark Thread* - Post it here or it didn't happen :D
tps3443 replied to Mr. Fox's topic in Desktop Hardware
That RTX4080 is still blazing fast though. It does its job. It’s really not middle ground is it. The **80 series of GPU’s was always the high end I thought. While **70 or **60 was mid range. -
*Official Benchmark Thread* - Post it here or it didn't happen :D
tps3443 replied to Mr. Fox's topic in Desktop Hardware
I’m gonna pull my Pora3 off of my test bench and put it inside a enclosure like @Mr. Fox has his, and then mount (9) of those Alphacool fans. 4000rpm is insane. -
*Official Benchmark Thread* - Post it here or it didn't happen :D
tps3443 replied to Mr. Fox's topic in Desktop Hardware
Nice sale on the 3090Ti KP!! We can’t fetch nearly that much for our regular 3090 KP’s even though it’s only a little slower lol. 😭 Force 134 was SP115-SP116 P-Cores from comparing to other guys who can read both MSI and Asus “Silicon Prediction” and also had a Force 134. My Force 124 most likely had SP117-118 P-Cores based on another persons findings best case scenario is SP119 P-Cores. My Force 124 couldn’t do 6.3Ghz on single cores reliably. So it couldn’t possibly have been a SP120+ P-Core chip. It was still an incredible CPU though. It would do 5.8-6.2 with like 1.210 VROut voltage with 5.2 ring. Anyone with a SP120+ is running 6.3 or 6.4 on their single cores though. This chip should be in another league all together. Sugi’s chip is a Force 109, so I’d guess that this new chip is a minimum Force rating of 117 or probably even Force 114. And with really cold water it will be a Force 107-110. I’m using educated speculation here lol. Of course all chips are different regardless of SP. We will find out it’s Force2 on the 12th though. I’m thinking Force 115 most likely on ambient water.