Papusan

Intel Core i9-14900KS Review - The Last of its Kind techpowerup.com LOOL And how shall Intel close the gap with next gen processors? No more HT wil surely help. But you'll lose 33% of the threads. At least some good news.... Intel adds 12 games to Application Optimization (APO) and “Advanced Mode” enabling 12th Gen Core+ support If you have an Intel CPU from the 12/13 or 14th Gen Core series, make sure to leave a comment if you see any gains in games that weren’t listed above. Source: Intel APO Intel® Application Optimization Requirements Supported Intel® Core™ Desktop and Mobile i3, i5, i7 and i9 processors (Intel® Core™ 12th gen and newer). Fully supported processors are listed in the below section. All other Intel® Core™ processors 12th gen through 14th gen that are not listed below have limited support and can only be used with Advanced Mode. Users with processors not listed above may choose to use Intel Application Optimization under Advanced Mode.

Of course Intel wasn't keen push out review samples before it was almost to late for review on launch day. 100C all over the place. Could you compare with the single core boost with same monitoring software? https://overclocking.com/labo-le-i9-14900ks-est-dans-le-labo-mais/ We only received our copy this Tuesday at the end of the day, so it was impossible for us to offer you a complete test on time. And this is just stupid... Maybe Intel have no 14900K in stock to compare with? Intel didn’t benchmark the 14900KS against the 14900K. But the company did test the chip against its direct predecessor, the Core i9-13900KS, which launched a year ago with a 6GHz top speed. The catch is that the 14900KS was running Intel’s Application Optimization feature, which is designed to further improve performance on supported games. For now, the APO feature is exclusive to the 14th generation desktop line. Intel Application Optimization (APO) is also expanded, where this now supports a total of 14 game titles. Intel's Core i9-14900KS Chip Is Here With 6.2GHz Speeds

The elite/fab clockers will as usual get the top of the cream. They got their handpicked chips long time ago. And your KF is an KS. Intel couldn’t use that cpu due faulty iGpu🙂 https://community.hwbot.org/topic/232585-elmor-core-i9-14900ks-8p-91178mhz-911775-mhz-cpu-frequency/ https://videocardz.com/newz/intel-core-i9-14900ks-has-been-overclocked-to-9117-mhz-claiming-new-world-record

Thanks. All Dell Alienware have short circuits. Every single of them. And many of them have dead CPU when they come into the repair shop. Fantastic. And don't blame Intel for this. It's all on Dell. So no wonder Dell is big regarding offer their customers extended warranty for huge premium. Disgusting? Yup. Intel Core i9-14900KS Review: The Last Core i9 Hits Record 6.2 GHz at Stock Setting Yup, one more joke for the day. 25% more expensive ($139) for 1.5% gains in multithreaded applications. Wow, that's a huge win, LOOL Oh'well, ordered one🙂 Expected arrival within 4-6 days. Converted without tax. $675.59 United States Dollar. The vanilla 14900K cost $558.97 United States Dollar without tax. Edit. The 14900KS is already sold out 5 min after I picked it up. I had two in the basket but went with one.

Thanks. Did you compare latest official bios 2002 for the White Apex that contain Intel microcode 0x123 with the new beta bios that also come with 0x123 ? Or was the older bios version with the better Aida memory speed with an older MC? If I understand you correct.... The only difference was MC 0x123 for the new beta vs your older bios? In short. Did you compare bioses with same MC 0x123 ? Sorry if I didn't understand you correctly.

Hmmm. Thanks. It seems they try make the bios works with the coming KS. Did you check if Asus added latest MEI 16.1.30.2330 firmware in their beta? And did you check if they used same MC as for previous bios version? Maybe it contain a new not released MC version. Two day ago Intel released a new MC for Linux New Intel CPU Microcode & "RFDS" Linux Kernel Patch

Safedisk have released new beta bios today for the new Cpu. As usual... Release notes are almost non-existent. ROG MAXIMUS/STRIX Z790 Series Beta Bios 2101/1101 ROG MAXIMUS Z790 APEX Beta Bios 2101 https://drive.google.com/file/d/1l1gTW93swzO0ajPLM1qywo5lGRzN91h5/view?usp=sharing ROG MAXIMUS Z790 APEX ENCORE Beta Bios 1101 https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ASZvSreO6QNecAg7Yzlalqu4rq-9MCKZ/view?usp=sharing

I don't see this as big profits. With graphics cards you need only a single platform. With Cpu mining you need MB/ram and Cpu for every setup. So $850+ in cost. Then you have different places in the world you pay a lot for the elecricity. Let them mine and earn minimum. Stupidity always come at a cost. Can't be cured.

From Seasonic.... The exact time to market depends on your location. Please contact *****@*****.tld for more information. Send them an email. Regarding lifetime of mating cycles... Seasonic use whatever numbers they can pull out from their hat. In previous link they said 50 cycles is the "normal" standard. Here below can you see they say.... Designed for a lifetime of 30 mating cycles, a normal standard for connectors. So put in what number you want🙂 One thing for sure.... Lower quality cables/connectors will have lower maiting cycles. In short... I would avoid Cablemod (custom) cables as I already have stated several times. Happy mating😀

Why buy custom cables with (angled) 12V-2x6 connectors from Cablemod when you can get them from the PSU OEM? About time all the different OEM brands doing the same. This type cable is here to stay. You don't need any of the cheapo made custom cables from Cablemod. Buy a quality PSU from a reputable brand and you get quality cables on top as well. Seasonic launches 12V-2×6 (H++) 600W power cables for NVIDIA RTX GPUs Hmmm. Designed for a lifetime of 50 mating cycles, a normal standard for connectors. When become 50 mating cycles the normal standard for connectors? For low/mid end.

GTX780 - 3DMARK11 https://hwbot.org/submission/5505758_papusan_3dmark11___performance_geforce_gtx_780_19263_marks?recalculate=true

Preliminary list of what I have of desktop graphics cards. Only two AMD cards. The rest is NVIDIA CARDS. And that's intended. I don't like AMD cards for a reason🤔 The "Dead Editions" is killed cards that can serve as spare parts😀 And the best part.... All outside the 4090 HOF can be used with Windows 7. ASUS GTX 480 ASUS GTX 480 MSI GTX 560Ti TWIN FROZR II POWER EDITION O/C GAINWARD GTX 570 GOLDEN SAMPLE (DEAD EDITION) MSI GTX 570 - 448 SHADERS TWIN FROZR II POWER EDITION O/C POINT OF VIEW GTX 580 ZOTAC GTX 580 AMP! EDITION GAINWARD GTX 650Ti ASUS GTX 670 DIRECT CU II MSI GTX 680 LIGHTNING MEDION GT 705 OEM EVGA GTX 750Ti FTW GAMING ACX 2.0 MSI GTX 750Ti TWIN FROZR III EVGA GTX 760 SC GAMING ACX 2.0 EVGA GTX 780 CLASSIFIED MSI GTX 960 MILLENIUM EDITION GALAX GTX 970 HOF MSI GTX 980 GAMING 4G EVGA GTX 980 CLASSIFIED K|NGP|N EDITION ZOTAC GTX 980Ti AMP! EXTREME EDITION GALAX GTX 980Ti HOF ASUS GTX 1060 STRIX OC EDITION GIGABYTE GTX 1070 GAMING 1 (DEAD EDITION) ASUS GTX 1070 STRIX OC EDITION ASUS GTX 1080Ti STRIX OC EDITION GALAX RTX 4090 HOF AMD GRAPHICS CARDS............ ASUS HD 6870 (DEAD EDITION) GIGABYTE 7970

Yup. 50% more threads would make an huge difference in performance. But with todays Ryzen chips not much would have changed on the bot if more people posted results. The best results is already subbed on the leadeboard. Remember the elite/fab clockers use both AMD and Intel chips as they being released. And they get the best binned chips you can find. In other words... Handpicked chips directly from Intel and AMD.

There are several different results for the multi thread performance crown. Depends on the benchmarks and who did the tests. Just head over to Hwbot or techpowerup. You'll see more Intel than AMD on top of the global leaderboards on Hwbot. If I used an AMD processor for my benching I would struggle keep up on Hwbot leaderboard🙂

Hmmm. You didn't find a box with more RGB? At least you got Gaming stamped upwards the flashy lights😁 Me seeing this..... And here is bro @Mr. Fox when he see it....😀

Congrats bro. But please scrap that RGB thingy😀 Loads of disgusting RGB doesn't mean the cooling will perform better🤩 Or I'm wrong? I don't think so. When you have it up maybe post some pictures.

If this is something to expect.... <140 points on the single-threaded score is around a 12% gain over the Ryzen 9 7950X, while the multi-core score is right about 10% faster>. Then I can understand why Intel ditching HT for Arrow Lake Cpu's. This way they can lower the total power consumption without losing the multi thread performance crown over to AMD. Because there is no competition that offer the best you can get. Sad AMD trashing the competition🙁 Exactly the same way they did with 7900XTX vs Nvidia's best Sku. Hmmm. Have Mr. Azor changed HW department now? Went from the AMD graphics group and over to Ryzen processors for consumers. Hmmm. Sad reading. Sorry, but this means AMD will Sucks once again. AMD = Another-Midrange-Disaster. GTX780 - 3DMark05 https://hwbot.org/submission/5502959_papusan_3dmark05_geforce_gtx_780_107749_marks GTX780 - 3DMark06 https://hwbot.org/submission/5502992_papusan_3dmark06_geforce_gtx_780_81311_marks?recalculate=true

Me?🤐

Probably when they are forced to do so. They pushed out old hardware from Win 11 du they said security was their main priority and goal. Everything coming from Redmond HQ is just lies. Microsoft left a kernel-level, zero-day bug in Windows for six months before patching it Hackers exploited the issue to spread an extremely stealthy rootkit

Yup. Newer doesn't always mean better. Just with more bugs. Despite Microsoft's claim, kernel reveals why Windows 11 isn't really faster than 10 neowin.com · Mar 5, 2024 During the revelation of Intel's 12th Gen CPUs, Microsoft claimed that users would see the true benefit of the hybrid CPUs on Windows 11. However, the kernel has revealed why that hasn't happened. Do you like stupidity bro @Mr. Fox? Is newer always better @ryan?🤔

Yup. Why release Win 11 in the first place? All features in Win 11 could easly be implemented in theold Windows 10. But Microsoft wanted get rid of some older hardware so their partners could increase their profits. Push you on new hardware will also help Microdft to sell more OS lisences. Disgusting? Or just stupid? Despite Microsoft's claim, kernel reveals why Windows 11 isn't really faster than 10 neowin.com · Mar 5, 2024 During the revelation of Intel's 12th Gen CPUs, Microsoft claimed that users would see the true benefit of the hybrid CPUs on Windows 11. However, the kernel has revealed why that hasn't happened. Do you like stupidity bro @Mr. Fox? Is newer always better @ryan?🤔

Hmmmm. AMD in the spotlight today🙂 And not because they shine. AMD’s Lisa Su steps in to fix driver issues with GPUs in new TinyBox AI servers The intervention comes as Tiny Box publicly frets about Radeon-based platform bugs Open-source Nvidia Nouveau contributor confident driver will add HDMI 2.1 support, unlike AMD's troubles "Even though AMD might not be able to add support for HDMI 2.1 [to open-source Linux drivers], Nouveau certainly will as Nvidia's open source driver also supports HDMI 2.1 so there is no reason to believe that at least some drivers can't support HDMI 2.1," Herbs wrote at Mastodon. "It is quite backwards, but apparently having all the logic inside firmware (like Nvidia does) will probably help us implementing support for HDMI 2.1."

GTX780 https://hwbot.org/submission/5501248_papusan_3dmark___cloud_gate_geforce_gtx_780_64249_marks https://hwbot.org/submission/5501257_papusan_3dmark_vantage___performance_geforce_gtx_780_81473_marks https://hwbot.org/submission/5501249_papusan_3dmark___sky_diver_geforce_gtx_780_47418_marks https://hwbot.org/submission/5501251_papusan_3dmark___cloud_gate_(gpu)_geforce_gtx_780_83556_marks https://hwbot.org/submission/5501258_papusan_3dmark_vantage___performance_(gpu)_geforce_gtx_780_70701_marks Two post in a row now. And with images. Can't be better than that😁

Sorry. And hey🙂 Spent the day repasting the new old for benching😂 GTX780 https://hwbot.org/submission/5501206_papusan_unigine_superposition___1080p_xtreme_geforce_gtx_780_2973_points?recalculate=true

Also EVGA fail hard with their binning for their flagship graphics cards. Should not be possible bin from 68% and up to 92% ascic score for same SKU series. And on top their Classified cards. Isn't it disgusting bro @Mr. Fox?🙄 See also.... At the rear of the card we see a very large PCB. What baffles me though is that EVGA does not equip the card with a back plate, you need to optionally purchase it for 20 USD. That is not what I expect for a top / flagship / leading SKU. GTX 780 ASIC Quality Asic Quality 78.9%. Nothing fantastic for the GTX 780 Classified. But it's what it is. And this one need a re-paste. Runs quite hot with the XOC vbios and +1.3v on the cores https://hwbot.org/submission/5500411_papusan_gpupi_v3.3___1b_geforce_gtx_780_25sec_417ms?recalculate=true