johnksss

The bot would need something that could auto detect for 3dmark, but that seems virtually impossible. So it is what it is. Me personally, I can't be spending all day on complaining about them and the ranking and scoring system. If i feel like submitting then I will if not, then I'll just sit back Like I have been doing. If the 4090 TI comes out then for me it will be a moot point as I will trade this card in for a 4090TI and all my points will be void yet again for the newer card.

That score will be getting kicked to the curb.... but how fast after the 15th is the million dollar question. I'm ready for the score changes because I don't have a bunch of bugged runs, but that 3090 NVlink I was really mad about. That cost real money! Along with the mobile gpus scores they lost of mine.

If it was implemented and no one even knew it was there, no one would be the wiser on scores being able to go higher. It's only because people know that makes it a real problem. The issue is people do benchmarks a certain way and along comes a bunch of cheaters messing with the system. So changes have to be made. And this is their answer thus far. I already complained about my benchmarks being removed and that was that. Time to move on and adapt is what I do. Most if not all of the 30 series had ECC as well as 40 Series.... The difference is they exposed it to the OS. From my understanding.

We want to keep it off as it gives higher scores, but with it off...People run benchmarks with crazy high memory over clocks which cause the benchmark to glitch out and start running faster than normal as it's no longer rendering all the content. ECC does error correcting so it means you can not really run crazy mem over clocks stable.

Not sure that will fly past when it hits 3dmark website.... speculations of course.

Keeping it on is valid, but turning it off for 3dmark benchmarks is not valid.

Below means it's enabled right? 23.5GB. Above means ECC is off 24.5GB

Didn't try that tip you mentioned but will try it when I reboot my pc.

So that's with ECC off right? Edit: Well, maybe not. LOL

I always wondered where your avatar came from. 🤣

It became to much of a hassle...At every turn we were getting shut down and our suggestions were getting blocked by tricking us into working with manufactures on making a better product for the community, but it was to help them lock us out of them. Then allow them to make a cheaper version as we couldn't get past their power related issues.... And the list goes on.

Thanks. So I see! 🙂 I went down that path for like 2 days, but everything resulted in partial driver installed, but with error 43. So I gave up. That was back when I got my first card.

That guy does come off as a smart ass part of the time. At least it seems like that to me. Edit: I see my scores are falling off fast...

Well I sure as hell feel all of 55 right now! 😂

Happy birthday brother Fox @Mr. Fox

Not sure if this has been posted, but...... miners still trying to have the last laugh. Video is not in English though, but you can see what he does and get the general idea. https://www.notebookcheck.net/Cryptominers-are-selling-used-GPUs-as-new-with-repainted-VRAM-chips.685588.0.html

Yep, definitely keeping my 13900KS SP112 P120/E97 Force 2 144.

First time was something like 57 then it jumped up to 79, but can boot 8200 on the Unify-X Okay, thanks.

🤣 Edit: No change in voltage...

What I do know is it is better than the K I had. The E cores clock between 4.7 and 4.760. I just tested the other chip and it's a SP 108 P117/E 92 And am sitting just under you @Papusanat 44916 on R23 K chip was a struggle to get to 44K R23. Edit: Going to flash a new bios and see if there is a change in the VF curve...

So, I had to go pick up a board and I grabbed a second KS chip while I was there, but haven't cracked it open yet. This first chip I tested is a: Is this any good?

As to my experience thus far....This time around they picked up the tab. They tried to offer me the Unify 4 Dimm board (Because they could not fix mine and they could ship that that out immediately) as I asked them to fix the broken PCIE tab they broke on the first RMA, but I declined. So they went on a hunt to find another Unify-X from a different warehouse, which they did find, but wont be shipped out until next week sometime. My problem with them mainly is the turn around time, but I have to say it has to do with them actually trying to fix the board instead of grabbing another off the shelf and just shipping it off. Which is most preferred of course, but it is 100% not realistic with every company who higher these specific techs who diagnose and fix these PCB related problems. And these last few times I think it was more user error than the boards actual fault and I can accept that as no one is perfect and I do make mistakes. So I respectfully take the good with the bad considering my luck has been more positive than negative with them. Now I think that has to do with me having more available options for parts so that might play a bigger role in the grand scheme of things.

Still waiting to see how their RMA process is going to turn out though...