johnksss

Ah, thanks. Mine you can't do that with. It's either 1 eye piece and the camera or both eye pieces and no camera.

Really? What did they say about it? My boom arm still moves like it's on greased wheels. I was using it a few weeks ago to look over my MSI motherboard before shipping it off for RMA. No problem Rage Set.

My setup that I bought in 2019: https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B004UBNIMC/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b_search_asin_title?ie=UTF8&psc=1 https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B07S5Z65HQ/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b_search_asin_title?ie=UTF8&psc=1 AmScope RU050 0.5X C-Mount Reduction Lens for Microscope Cameras And yes, I still love it! Still 100% working and no issues after 3 years 3 months. And I especially like the ring lighting.

Go ryan!

Option 3 in the folder...Now i'm a bit lost, but if you say you tried it and it failed then I'm going to go with that. That is interesting though. That is like a fail safe for pretty much all Nvidia cards that do not have voltage control. As far as benching goes, you do not need the latest driver for anything below 4090's so pick any old driver and run with it. 457.30 or .57 was a great driver for older Nvidia cards.

And you picked the correct file to modify right?

Already did. roughly 1k point difference. Or a difference of 5FPS(gamers)

We both had user error here....resizable-bar was turned off...🤦‍♂️ Still no where near my 29.2K though, but did break 28K

I had to print a retraction... User error. LOL

I knew I wasn't crazy! I'm trying to understand how the hell Nizzen got those scores. https://community.hwbot.org/topic/221551-giant-3d-elephant-in-the-room-no-one-wants-to-talk-aboutwhy-is-it-always-me-bringing-this-stuff-to-light/?do=findComment&comment=632843 Yeah, this card is def going back and i'll just run with my 3090 for now.

@Papusan When you get a chance can you run port royal with ecc enabled? Over clocked

Yeah, not me. I'm done wasting time and money on something I no longer have to keep.🙂 I looked, but I could not find any of your benchmarks with your card. Can you send me a few links? Thanks. Also, what do you get with enabling ECC and benching port royal?

True. As 2001 had SLI/Crossfire.

3090's are gone, but anything before that seems to still be up and running.

I lost over 300 global points in the last 3 days.

No problem. Nope, they kicked out a bunch of other folks scores and that pushed you up the list.... for now....🙂

On any driver that does not have voltage control: Add this line at the bottom of the [startup] in the profile folder/profile for the card you are running. Make sure voltage has been unlocked using the msi settings page. restart msi afterburner and you should have voltage control [settings] vddc_generic_detection=1 PS: Make use to take control of the file or it wont let you save the changes.

Beta over clock software for the 4090? My sliders worked on all 3 of my cards, provided it was only 50mv. I'm not sure I understand my friend? As to older cards you may be right. The oldest card I have at the moment is a 1070 in my server and it moves like only 43mv. Now that one is on a much older driver as well.

But can't you use the voltage hack for the 980 TI to get it to work or was that what was being used and got removed?

And now they are on the 3090 nvlink sli benchmarks....🤦‍♂️

7900 XT is not sold out at my Microcenter and plenty of others as well. https://www.microcenter.com/category/4294966937/graphics-cards Now the XTX version which would have been the smarter move to buy is sold out.

Yep, I still have it. I did use it a few times when I had 3090 NVLink going.

@Mr. Fox Watching the Kingpin video at 20:50 oh man! That is exactly what Dell/Alienware did to us! @24:06 Vince let me get the 2 way version of that board.

Silly? I think you miss understand my friend.🙂 Although I didn't think this was new to an old head like your self though.... Also why I called it the "Jufres" test, but no. 1: You are testing if you have good or bad memory and this is the fastest way to find out. Nothing about stability being tested in this part of testing. 2: Testing for max clocks. Core and memory. This is like you having an Asus board that can read the SP and MC SP rating. 3: Once that is established. Then you work your way up or back from the max or stock clocks with benching and gaming. Once found, then you can go back to doing things normal or at your best stable clocks knowing that you have a good product. The reason for this as we have seen time and time again are early adopters get to super bragging about how great their part is only to find out that it was crap. And now they are mad because they did not know the true scale in which to work with. So you get said card and say it does what I need it to do and it's great with 1000+ vram over clock. Only to find out that it was not great and your card is actually a dud. How? because you try to do 1050 and your pc crashes, while others are doing 1500 to 2200+ with ease. Now in the grand scheme of things if you are a gamer then this really doesn't amount to anything as all the cards will game on stock clocks, but for people wanting to get what they paid for. it's a big deal.

I like how the Zotac looks as well, but then the Suprim X is growing on me also.🙂 Looks like quite a few cheater scores are still up and going strong. Older hardware is much more satisfying when you have a new base (Motherboard/cpu/memory) product to run it with. And as ECC goes I can live with it as long as they remove everyone else in question. I would rather have it that way to begin with, but dont start with me first on the damn chopping block!😂 That was actually your cue to leave when it was posted. So you could beat the traffic.😁 Thanks...😢 I'm kind of over it, but glad my money in this is movable, so not as mad as one could be.