Mr. Fox

25 minutes ago, Mr. Fox said:

Most of my life I never cared about loud fans. I kind of still do not care very much, but I have to care to some degree only because I spend so many hours daily in teleconferences and video meetings now that having loud fans howling 3 feet away from my mic is just not going to fly. Even with the quiet/weak F12 fans the mic is very sensitive and the fan sound is grossly exaggerated. Sometimes people complain and I am oblivious because they are not loud from where I am sitting.

4 minutes ago, Etern4l said:

 

I do enjoy quiet working conditions. With the PC etc. next to the desk, the noise level at my chair is 42dB (this is classified as "quiet library" by the Sound Meter app), goes up to 48dB (quiet library/office flickering) right next to the PC with something like 12 case fans running at full speed (not including GPU fans).

 

I imagine a typical gaming laptop with fans running at full speed and a cooler would be firmly in the high 50s. Noticeably more annoying conditions without the use of noise cancelling headphones, or similar.

Here is a live example of the impact even quiet fans can have on video conferencing and video recording. As you can see in the decibel meter, the noise level is inconsequential in a live environment, but magnified in a recorded or audio streaming environment.

13 minutes ago, Rage Set said:

 

I use only Noctua iPPC 3000 PWN fans with both MO-RA radiators I have and I love them. I have a total of 30 of these fans in various builds around my home office. I got tired of replacing fans from other brands, mainly EKWB. I never needed quiet focused fans but I also the guy that slapped three delta fans to a modded laptop cooler. 

Most of my life I never cared about loud fans. I kind of still do not care very much, but I have to care to some degree only because I spend so many hours daily in teleconferences and video meetings now that having loud fans howling 3 feet away from my mic is just not going to fly. Even with the quiet/weak F12 fans the mic is very sensitive and the fan sound is grossly exaggerated. Sometimes people complain and I am oblivious because they are not loud from where I am sitting.

21 minutes ago, Etern4l said:

Well, looks like the Arctic fans are not too difficult to beat - it's impressive that the AFII does so well with those on. Surprisingly though, Noctua lost the 120mm fan performance crown! Phanteks T30 is the new king. The price is not ideal, but looking at the test results, just 3 of these on the AIO should bring the temps down enough. The catch of course is that it's a 30mm fan, so need to figure out the radiator screws. M3 are provided in the box. Anyone knows if the radiator screws on the Arctic Freezer II 360 (Rev 2 I believe, 2022 model) are M3 or M4?

That's correct. They are not difficult at all to beat on performance. They are very inexpensive and only a good option when you don't need powerful fans to get the job done. Their only noteworthy virtue and admirable attribute is the low cost. If you only need a basic fan and they are strong enough to get the job done, then they are a very sensible option. I hate spending money on fans, but I also hate wasting money on junk. They are not junk, just weak fans. Mine are very old and have seen lots of use. They are holding up well.

I do like how thin the wires are. When you are packing an array of 9 fans (3x3) onto a square radiator, fat wires with fancy sleeves quickly become more detrimental and inconvenient than useful. The thin wires are very easy to manage and take up very little space.

1 hour ago, electrosoft said:

The boards are identical so a block for the air cooled model would fit the liquid cooled model too fortunately.

1 hour ago, Mr. Fox said:

If/when I eventually buy one, I will buy whichever one is available cheaper with the intent of replacing the stock cooler with a waterblock. Same as I did my 3090 KPE and 3060 Ti. I would prefer the air cooled version because they are easier to sell later than a hybrid. 

I am not ready to buy a 4090, but based on how many of them are being under-built, if and when I land on one it seems like the good options are more or less limited to Suprim X, FE and Zotac Amp Extreme. And, those are the hardest to find. The cheaper gamer versions that are adequate for gaming leave a lot to be desired and they are not overly difficult to source. I could have purchased 30 of the mediocre gamerboy options in the past week or two.

The other options are light on power phases and more likely to not hold up to the kind of overclocking I would expect. If I were buying one for gaming, the least expensive option would be the best approach because any of them should function flawlessly at stock clocks and power limits. All they would need is a good cooler and a good warranty to function as a run-of-the-mill gamerboy 4090.

1 hour ago, cylix said:

Still amazed how gigantic the Air cooling on the 4090 is. Without it the board is pretty small.

 

 

It really is crazy how small they are now and how much space is wasted on gigantic air coolers.

When I look at how my 2080 Ti FTW3 and 3090 KPE, even my 3060 Ti FTW3, were built, it is not very confidence-inspiring. It is difficult to comprehend how much difference there is in size and to know to what degree it matters. Either the old GPUs were engineered in a very antiquated, wasteful and thoughtless manner in terms of PCB size and complexity, or the 40-series GPUs are cutting lots of corners and setting us all up for failure with lackluster engineering. Not sure which view is more accurate.

1 minute ago, electrosoft said:

 

The boards are identical so a block for the air cooled model would fit the liquid cooled model too fortunately.

 

 

If/when I eventually buy one, I will buy whichever one is available cheaper with the intent of replacing the stock cooler with a waterblock. Same as I did my 3090 KPE and 3060 Ti. I would prefer the air cooled version because they are easier to sell later than a hybrid. 

14 minutes ago, electrosoft said:

Suprim back in stock in NE:

 

https://www.newegg.com/msi-geforce-rtx-4090-rtx-4090-suprim-liquid-24g/p/N82E16814137779?Item=N82E16814137779&Description=4090&cm_re=4090-_-14-137-779-_-Product&quicklink=true

 

 

Only the hybrid version.  The Suprim (non-X and non-liquid) is only available from a NE marketplace scalper, LOL. WAY, WAY, WAY overpriced from the scalper. It is $350 more for the air cooled version from the retarded reseller source.

3 hours ago, Etern4l said:

Makes perfect sense in your case, however, I would be replacing mainly Arctic P12s I believe, so really need something with a major kick. Will also go back and look at Bro @Papusan's earlier power fan posts. I was hoping I could get away with aircooling and silent fans, sadly at least one has to go. 

There is a notable improvement in airflow versus Arctic P12 fans. I have 9 of those on my XT45 radiator in a push configuration. They are adequate, but do not move a massive amount of air. They do not need to for that 360*360 radiator. The are very quiet and that the major reason (combined with adequacy and the fact that I already owned them) why I am using them. There are other circumstances where I have found P12 fans to be woefully inadequate due to low CFM unless combined in a push/pull configuration.

2 hours ago, ryan said:

I think @Ashtrixs post could be summed up as RTX is great but is it worth the performance hit. NOPE

1 hour ago, Clamibot said:

 

Yep, traditional rasterization has gotten so advanced and looks good enough at this point where I couldn't care less about raytracing in most games. Raytracing makes for a laggy unoptimized game as all it does is make your hardware do a lot of extra work for barely any gain in visual fidelity in most cases.

 

There are cases where raytraced effects make sense, such as in dynamic scenes. If you have a day/night cycle in your game, GPU accelerated raytraced reflections could make sense, especially if you have a butt ton of objects in the scene as a realtime reflection probe would absolutely hammer the CPU in that case.

 

The problem is essentially that in most games that currently have raytracing, it either isn't used properly or isn't needed, so it ends up causing a massive performance loss for barely any visual gain. Bright Memory is an example of Raytracing being used effectively as the reflections look absolutely amazing. Same with Metro Exodus Enhanced Edition, the raytraced lighting increases immersion by a lot.

 

What we definitely don't need is raytracing being proprietary tech that requires proprietary hardware.

There are ways to rationalize the pros and cons of ray tracing to suit individual preferenced and opinions. When it is used correctly it is nothing short of great, and when not used effectively it adds no value. It may even detract from value when it causes a catastrophic degradation of performance. Poorly optimized games have always been, and will continue to be, an issue with or without ray tracing. That's not something new for us.

I think the bottom line is that ray tracing is a thing now, will continue to be a thing in the future, and having a GPU that can manage it well enough to not be a slide show is something avid gamers should be shooting for when selecting a GPU. To say it is a gimmick that does not matter and not taking it into consideration when choosing what GPU to buy is a mistake that will ultimately end with regret and dissatisfaction as the technology matures. If it did not matter, we would not see AMD burning calories trying to get better at it, and game developers would not be incorporating it in new titles and remastered legacy titles.

The good news is, a GPU as mediocre and low cost as a 3060 Ti can handle it with ease if the correct graphics settings are selected. That may not be true of weaker low-cost laptop GPUs and may not be accurate for the current mid-range products offered by AMD. If they are not design to handle it, then it is going to suck with those products. All that means is that they are not cut out for the task. It doesn't mean they are garbage GPUs, and it doesn't mean ray tracing is garbage. They simply were not designed with the technology in mind, so it is unrealistic to expect them to be good at it.

Even though 7900XT/XTX are not necessarily fantastic at ray tracing  management, I still think you can select graphics settings that tone things down enough to allow you to enjoy ray tracing enhancements without turning the game into a slide show. When the game is immersive and captivating, this adds to the experience and differences in the magnitude of the effect are less consequential than a total absence of ray tracing in any form.

19 minutes ago, Etern4l said:

 

Thanks bro, open to ideas, as I would be looking to replace between 8 and 11 fans myself. 

I found some Antec fans on Amazon that I am pleased with that do a nice job. That might be a good alternative. They cost about half what the equivalent Noctua fan does and they are available in multi-fan packages. They have rubber isolators on the corners to help with noise and vibration, too.

10 hours ago, KING19 said:

 

That is true but at same time its still a gimmick because only High End GPUs can barely handle it with DLSS/FSR on to get playable FPS but it also introduces more issues like ghosting and shimmering at times. Companies are pushing RT so hard when majority of people dont have the specs to use it property..

I'm not sure that is entirely correct. It is accurate from a limited perspective. To say it is a gimmick because you need a high end GPU to use it without DLSS/FSR turned on to get playable FPS seems to define a gimmick as anything that doesn't work well on old, weak or inexpensive hardware. I could see a lot of laptops with anemic GPUs struggling with it, but that doesn't make it a gimmick. It just means they're anemic products that need to be replaced to stay current. Thankfully, that is not holding back progress for everyone that isn't playing games on cheap or old laptops. 

Here is a video where I use a game that does a great job of enhancing things with ray tracing. I go through each configuration available with ray tracing from DLSS off through the various DLSS settings. Even with DLSS off it is not unplayable (although less FPS than ideal). Only the 8K mode looks crappy. This is with my 3060 Ti, so definitely not a high-end GPU by desktop GPU standards. That said, I believe a $350 3060 Ti desktop GPU performs better than mobile 3070 and roughly on par with a 3080 notebook GPU, so the comment about needing a "high end" GPU might apply from a laptop user's somewhat biased reference being limited to the context of laptop graphics capabilities. 

1 hour ago, Etern4l said:

Guys, I need to upgrade fans on my Arctic 360 AIO and possibly elsewhere. What's the best option in the high performance range? Noctua NF-12 iPPC 3000 rpm? 

Noctua certainly makes good ones. I doubt you could go wrong on the quality, but there may be an equally effective option that is less expensive.

I can't say what fans are the best because I usually do not purchase expensive fans. I have too many (20 fans on one computer and 22 fans on another) and it becomes cost prohibitive to buy high-end fans.

11 minutes ago, Raiderman said:

What a sh!t show.

It really is. It makes me sad to admit it, but they are getting worse. I thought it might get better after der8auer bought it, but it is not. He is not interfering in the day-to-day, but I am thinking maybe he should.

Twitter still sucks, but it is much, much better now under new ownership because the status quo stupidity of the past is no longer tolerated and the retarded monkey business is no longer allowed. We have engagement of the new ownership to thank for it being less of a leftist-controlled cesspool.

28 minutes ago, Papusan said:

And I who thought this was your new case and not your MB. Looks damn modern. Yep, I learn something new everyday

 

Or for a brand new AW desktop from Dell😎 The air fryer look is on the way to be old.

 

The air fryer is more reliable and looks better. The only thing worse than a modern black Alienware is a modern white Alienware. Ugly on the inside, and ugly on the outside. At least we can say they are consistent.

5 minutes ago, ryan said:

bought a motherboard

 

now to put in the gfx card

 

i think ill figure it out, just need the right cables and power supply. anyone know where a good place to buy a case is? need to tie this all together

 

 

metaphor

 

its how i feel compared to your guys vast knowledge

A PC that looks like a toaster would probably be something that some people would go for. It would be ironic for it to have thermal management problems if the case looks like a toaster.

The concept of a toaster is very fitting for modern laptops based upon how they (mis)behave, LoL.

4 hours ago, Custom90gt said:

My buddy is going to put together an unraid plex server with a 12600k + ASUS Z690-PLUS TUF Gaming WiFi D5 motherboard from MC (seems like a great value at $296 since the MB is only $50).  Memory speed really doesn't matter too much, but figured I'd ask what people recommend here. Cost is priority number 1, but if I could get him something with hynix memory I'd prefer that. I think the cheap patriot DDR5 on amazon has hynix and is around $100 for 32GB.  Any other thoughts?

If that Hynix memory is M-die for $100 it is a steal at that price. Even with a mediocre motherboard and average CPU you should be able to overclock it manually to around 6400 stable. The max stable memory overclock on the Strix Z690-E is 6400 with M-die, A-die and Samsung B-die (based on my extensive testing) and it is what Asus product documentation states as the supported maximum. There is no point in spending more for high-end modules when the functional limit of the motherboard does not allow you to use it.

The governments of the world are unworthy of our trust, and they've given us ample reason to have no confidence in them. Not all of them are overtly evil like China, Russia, North Korea, Cuba, etc. But, all of them abuse their power, misuse money, abuse taxation, abuse technology, illegally monitor, manipulate and exploit their citizens while being overly soft on crime and making excuses for the criminally insane. That's not a tin foil hat. It's called paying attention and calling them out for their incompetence and wrongful "leadership" failures.

3 hours ago, Etern4l said:

 

Well, looking at the outcome and capabilities, ChatGPT is anything but idiotic. They force some guardrails in an attempt to avoid the bad publicity of "AI bias", but that can be a double-edged sword. The underlying technology is only as biased as the underlying data, in this case a gigantic corpus of written word. Basically this chat has been trained on so much data, it knows almost everything we know (up to expert-level depth), and can effectively do a fair amount of reasoning on this knowledge. Then they added a "moral compass" on top for this application, but it's not there underneath. Based on this interface we can't really tell what the behaviour would be like if the "guardrails" were to be removed. All we know is that the AI would be completely honest.

 

 

Yes, and that's an immediate risk that pales in comparison to some of the more dystopian scenarios that await us down this road.

3 hours ago, Mr. Fox said:

I'm not very confident that the people developing this technology actually have a moral compass, and if they do have one, I have very little confidence that it points true north. Their concept of good and right may be the opposite by my definition. Therein lies the problem. They get to set the rules for everyone else to follow as the self-anointed arbiters. Not only no, but hell no.

This is exactly why it is, and will continue to be, a totally effed up piece of tech. It is totally inert in and of itself, just like a gun. Nothing wrong with the tech, and nothing wrong with guns. This kind of tech in the hands of people that will misuse it, even if they feel justified in their own mind, is probably far more dangerous to the well-being of the general public than a gun in the hands of an insane person that intends to use it for bad things.

Because the AI was trained to interpret things from its programmer's perspective, it actually does have personal beliefs and feelings. They are the personal beliefs and feelings of the person or group that programmed the AI. For this reason it will always be flawed and dangerous.

Here's a "Microsoft Update" 😉

I'm not very confident that the people developing this technology actually have a moral compass, and if they do have one, I have very little confidence that it points true north. Their concept of good and right may be the opposite by my definition. Therein lies the problem. They get to set the rules for everyone else to follow as the self-anointed arbiters. Not only no, but hell no.

Yes, I totally agree with you. It is Orwellian by every measurement. And, the AI will only be as intelligent (as in idiotic) as the people that program it how to "think" and how to decide what is good or bad based on the opinions of the programmer. GIGO. It's like the mainstream media on steroids and endowed with omnipotence. Anyone who doesn't think, act or believe in a manner that the AI was programmed to judge as acceptable will become a victim of digital terrorism.

1 minute ago, Raiderman said:

After reading a lot of reviews, most think RT is a bit over hyped considering the FPS hit you take when its enabled. To me, it seems more like a marketing gimmick and less of a necessity. Am I wrong?

I think so. While ray tracing is not necessary for a game to be enjoyable, the visual quality enhancement is nothing short of remarkable. Far more realistic graphics than without it. It doesn't make a fun game more fun or a boring game less boring. I never choose a game because it has it, but the difference it makes in the graphics quality is undeniable. If you have not been exposed a whole lot to it, then it is hard to relate to and easy to dismiss.

13 hours ago, Etern4l said:

You can try this AI for free at http://chat.openai.com

Thanks. That will be fun to goof around with. You could drive some emotionally unstable people bonkers with something like this. Maybe even push them over the edge.

On a more serious note, I believe the development of this type of AI is very dangerous if human beings put any degree of stock into it or ascribe credibility to it. It could be used for nefarious purposes and it would not surprise me if it already has been to some degree.

20 minutes ago, Papusan said:

 

Removing results that is valid as my 3DM Fire Srike Extreme and let the top benchers have the leaderbord for themself won't send a clearer signal to the others (see pict above in my previous post)...

 

Edit... In red.

 

 

Or just start from the top and remove Futuremark benches that have the info clear as glass. See pict below. 'again why start in the middle of the leaderboard? There has to be a reason they do it this way.

 

https://hwbot.org/submission/5130021_splave_3dmark___time_spy_extreme_geforce_rtx_4090_21023_marks

 

https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/83861241

 

 

 

See my updated post. https://community.hwbot.org/topic/221655-mandatory-systeminfo-555-update-and-new-benchmark-rules-for-rtx40-series/?do=findComment&comment=634928

@johnksss

Just now, Papusan said:

Yep, the golden boys... 

 

https://hwbot.org/submission/5130022_splave_3dmark___fire_strike_extreme_geforce_rtx_4090_49186_marks

 

Can have their results on the leaderboard... https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/83861339

 

Even the blind man can see that Futuremark don't offer ECC monitoring in somne of their older benchmarks... 

 

 

 

We should start spamming their submissions using the report feature to ask them to remove the scores and start treating their golden boys the same as they treat the peasants.

I see the HWBOT Nazis are arbitrarily deleting your 4090 benchmark's Brother @Papusanjust as they did with Brother @johnksss 4090 scores. Seems like the golden boys have decided to deal with competition by not allowing it. It is really sad to see what a pile of crap that place is turning into.

Maybe the idea is to make it a shill mill for manufacturers to send their boutique modded products that nobody else can buy to their sponsored marketing zombies to fake everyone out with results they will never achieve if they buy the same product.

Edit: I saw that and commented at EXACTLY the same time you were posting it.

3 minutes ago, Papusan said:

Nice small screen bro Fox. I look more after a smaller screen that I can put into the chassis. There is several options but difficult to what I want. Around 5.5" up to max 8". No need for a bigger one only for some HW info/statistics.

 

Btw... Nice. Got notice in email mods on the bot removed one of my subs. And they don't even understand how some of the sub benchmarks works inFuturemark software with the newer HW. And why pick people from the leadeboard from middle ranking and not the top benchers? Is this what they mean.... Clearer signals (see red box)? That if you are the elite benchers your bench results won't be blocked? And if they do, they will do it last? This is a mess. 

 

59 minutes ago, Raiderman said:

I'm digging the little 14"? Monitor for your system stats!

Thank you. Yes, it is an impressive product. Much better quality than I expected. 15-inch IPS with dual type-c and HDMI, metal housing with VESA. Comes with a nice folding hardcover for travel (like a tablet cover). Works nice as a monitoring panel, too.

38 minutes ago, Raiderman said:

Getting closer to cracking the 40K mark in CB 23. Need to do some tuning on the ram. Today is shot though, we are having an open house today, (selling).

 

Good luck on the sale. Are you moving locally, or to a totally new city/state? It's a real bummer that you're going to be affected by high interest rates in Brandon's dystopian social and economic cesspool. Hopefully, that will be remedied in the next couple of years and you can refi after all of his wrongs are righted.