Jump to content
NotebookTalk

jaybee83

Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    2,430

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    58

 Content Type 

Everything posted by jaybee83

  1. jaybee83
    haha i dont get the logic behind this either, but apparently there is indeed a difference between the two. otherwise, why would all 600W rated direct PSU cables only have 2x8 pins on the PSU side? what i wanted to say with this is that there arent any variations between those direct cables vs. the 3-4 pronged adapters. might have something to do with losses / temp variations due to additional mechanical connections. and yes, in theory it could be the PSU not delivering the power, but so far no indications for that. ive been hitting 3050-3180 Mhz on the core at 1.1V where i hit those 465W. i doubt that it would go above 3000 Mhz if the power were limited. as i said, i want to do some heavier stress testing first so we have better idea whats going on. will keep u guys updated!
  2. jaybee83
    ah no the number of 8pin adapters cant be compared on the GPU facing and PSU facing side. GPU facing vs GPU facing 4x8pin > 3x8pin > 2x8pin, but for PSU facing side all cables come with 2x8pin. besides, all testing ive done so far was voltage limited, i havent seen power limits come to fruition yet, thats why im looking for more power demanding tests 😄
  3. jaybee83
    nope not yet, but thx for the pointer! was also thinking of throwing smth stupid at it like furmark or kombustor 😂
  4. jaybee83
    yep its quite beefy, although from the looks of it the be quiet cable might be comparable. highest gpu power draw ive seen so far was 465W at 1.1V and oced. havent run any 3Dmark benches yet, so curious to see what thatll bring. i want to prove without a doubt that the TX-1600 cam exceed 450W on the gpu 😋
  5. jaybee83
    ive actually noticed the same for the regular Suprim X, saw the pricing on a particular online shop thats known for strictly sticking to MSRP pricing go up by 20€. not much yet, but maybe a sign of things to come. i was surprised at the start that the suprim 4090s were priced so low in comparison tbh, while being the ones with the strongest vrms and among the higher quality cards. so glad i got mine at the "super low" introductory price then!
  6. jaybee83
    actually, havent they already changed the whole usb naming scheme to just list the speed? the usb 4 v2 moniker is supposed to just be for internal developer reference. consumer facing theyll just list Gbps: https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2022/09/usb-if-says-goodbye-to-confusing-superspeed-usb-branding/ in any case, i juuuuust got my first 40 gbps (usb 4 / tb 4) ports in with my new desktop build and wham heres the next gen already 😂 quite insane if you think about it: 40 gbps is already sufficient to saturate external PCIe 3.0 x4 drives, with the new 80 gbps doing the same for PCIe 4.0 x4 drives, craaaaazy
  7. jaybee83
    alright guys, finished installing Hyperion, next step is to collect all my data off the Dark Knight and transfer it over. also planning to temporarily empty my two 860 Evos so I can fuse them together in a RAID 0 config. does anyone know if TRIM is still available for a RAID ssd config? would have to test that before i keep it. currently in JBOD, but easier to use the whole space in RAID (plus advantage in sequential performance which is my priority for like 99% of the data on those two drives). while installing, couldnt keep myself from doing some quick 4090 testing and oc 😅😋 so far ive been able to push the core up to 3180 Mhz and VRAM to around 24+ Gbps, absolute BEAST this gpu. ill need to do proper stress testing though to check stability. temps are in the mid 60s with hotspot hitting 70-74C. this is with my case cooling still pretty barebones, only have the three push fans on the AiO in the front and the three gpu fans, thats it 😋
  8. jaybee83
    i mostly use SM to check for firmware updates and with new drives if theyre authentic. aside from that, not much!
  9. jaybee83
    hardware pr0n, hope theres no kids around! 😂👌🏻
  10. jaybee83
    haha i figured this would be right up your alley in all white!
  11. jaybee83
    update on the neptune 4090, power range is 550 to 630W: https://m.expreview.com/85168.html
  12. jaybee83
    yep ive seen this behaviour early on in reviews, i think it was HUB. i didnt know about the higher gaming perf with just one CCD though! wth guys, why do we always need ro deactivate smth, baby cores or a ccd with the new cpus? 😅 need to check how mine is behaving, apparently not all cpus show this behaviour. still busy installing and setting up everything, havent gotten around to much tuning yet.
  13. jaybee83
    still setting up Hyperion and already encountered some driver install issues, but for now im just barreling through all my apps n games to get it done asap. in any case, was just curious to check it out (naturally 😛), so did some quick n dirty oc on the 4090 with MSI AB, ended up with 3150 Mhz Core and 24.1 Gbps on the VRAM. hot dayum!
  14. jaybee83
    noice, desktop boiiiis lets goooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
  15. jaybee83
    kool, keep us updated! direct comparison could pinpoint or rule out the psu 🙂 u also still have the stock one?
  16. jaybee83
    resist that temptation! get another sku instead for like 500 bucks less 😄 would be nice for corsair to get a bit more competition in that space. pricing is comparably crazy but at least with EVGA i have hope that there might be some worthwhile extras with it like software, tuning ability, good fans, etc. and not just an apple-esque "name" tax. word.
  17. jaybee83
    depends how good the cooling is on them. might be that the thermal pads he has installed are crappy (stock) or that they dont make proper contact. if u exceed the limits too fast and too hard ull not get to see throttling but skip directly towards the trip / shutdown.
  18. jaybee83
    also stock psu and whenever i do stress testing im also reaching that 260W, thats the cap on the mobo. but ive only ever experienced sudden shutdowns when allowing the CPU to get consistently over 98-100C. i could imagine that maybe the nearby VRMs also get too hot and thus inefficient to be able and stay stable.
  19. jaybee83
    btw guys, preliminary review on the 13900K, apparently some lucky dude ordered one online and they actually send it out to him 😄
  20. jaybee83
    wooooooooow.... dont drop it dude! 😅
  21. jaybee83
    yep exactly, i noticed the same. @GT3000 set the PROCHOT value to 98C in TS and the issue should be resolved 🙂
  22. jaybee83
    wouldve been an awesome way to pass the waiting time, getting to know Arc in depth and providing tons of info to the community here :) too bad theres nothing available...
  23. jaybee83
    shouldnt be possible on stock bios on this machine, since the mobo has a wattage limit implemented which cant just be switched off that easily. so either temp issues or indeed defective psu.
  24. jaybee83
    thats the thing, one one side u have expensive parts and platform but long-term support, on the other hand u have a dead-end platform with more value options (i.e. lower end cpus and DDR4)
  25. jaybee83
    hmmm....any tweaks uve implemented via TS? ive encountered the same when setting PROCHOT value too high under prolonged cpu stress.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Terms of Use