Mr. Fox

Yes, I have purchased from them a couple of times and they are excellent. I even had their head of sales call me to apologize for a mistake they had made. It wasn't a big deal in the grand scheme of things, but the fact that they cared enough was pretty great. We don't see that often in the tech space at all, especially with EVGA out of the picture.

Probably because it is a benchmark that Ryzen shines in. The opposite of what it would look like with AIDA64 Cache and Memory Benchmark. If you look on HWBOT we see really good numbers from Ryzen in Geekbench and it includes memory performance testing, just from a different angle than AIDA64, but it is not categorized as a memory benchmark. It is considered a CPU benchmark, but it is affected by memory performance. You are not wrong. He is certainly entitled to have an opinion, but sometimes expressing opinions in the wrong context can only be viewed as trolling or inappropriate. The issue is he was making comments on a article specifically about overclocking, and celebrating those results, with a comment he does not care about overclocking. The article is for those that do care. Kind of like going to a pizzeria and declaring you don't like pizza, but it's nice that you serve pizza for those that do. That person's presence at the pizzeria benefits no one and the comments serve no purpose. That person's motives for being there and his intelligence in making such a comment at that time and place might be legitimately called into question. That isn't persecution, it is expressing an opinion or making a statement that isn't relevant or useful and puzzling to those that do like pizza. The question one might ask is "Then why are you here?"

It is awesome to see that kind of performance jump. Anyone that doesn't like that is either lying or stupid. Speaking of stupidity, I think one of AMD's biggest challenges is the mentality of some of their customers. Like this one... That is detrimental to all concerned, including those that don't care but are too dumb to know better.

But, will it overclock? That's the million dollar question. With GPUs we are moving in the direction of just barely already because they are so castrated by firmware. If it is a beast and doesn't overclock, then "do not pass go and do not collect $200" is how I look at it. It doesn't earn the title "beast" if it doesn't overclock no matter how powerful it is, it's just a worthless gamerboy consumer play toy to me. No overclock = "push the buttons, pull the chain, out comes chocolate choo-choo train" or, if you prefer, "milk, milk, lemonade, 'round the corner fudge is made" 🤣

Hey guys. If you haven't seen this benchmark tool, check it out. I saw it on a Buildzoid video. https://github.com/clamchowder/MicrobenchmarksGui/releases/tag/v0.000006 It can be used to benchmark system RAM bandwidth and latency, and GPU VRAM when copying from CPU to GPU and GPU to CPU memory.

Yes, it is a strong CPU. I haven't ruled it out completely as an option to consider, I am just very apprehensive about a lot of things based on a long history of disappointment. But, for the first time ever I am disappointed with what Intel brought to the table. I don't like the design of Ryzen architecture, but it looks like the writing is on the wall now with Intel adopting tiled/chiplet crap. The choice isn't as clear as it was before Core Ultra reared its ugly head. I know you and I have discussed how a Ryzen 9 CPU might behave on a chiller since it is thermally limited boost clock. (Behavior is more like a modern GPU.) That could prove to be interesting if boost clock scales up when cool as much as it scales down when not cool. I'm leaning toward just doing nothing as being the best option since I am not concerned in the least about i9 degradation. But, no need for urgency, especially with Black Friday and Christmas sales coming soon. And who knows... maybe the bottom will fall out on Zen 5 and Core Ultra platform pricing since both have had a cooler reception than AMD and Intel had hoped they would. It will be interesting to observe if any new drama unfolds with the Zen 5 X3D chips. For whatever silly reason, it seems like new tech has an unhealthy dependency on Micro$lop's abortion OSes being optimized for proper functionality. When you stop and think about it, that is extremely sucky and shouldn't be the case at all. Every time AMD releases something new there is something wrong with Windoze holding it back that has to be fixed, and then when Intel started the smartphone core integration it was thread scheduler this, thread scheduler that, blah, blah, blah. None of that actually mattered using manual BIOS settings (fixed clocks and voltages) for everything... Winduhz became irrelevant. Windows 7 and 10 work marvelously with no Winduhz 11 thread scheduler nonsense with manual settings. Not sure if that applies equally to Ryzen as well.

Yes it certainly could be if it overclocks better than a 9950X does. I'm not very interested in stock performance though, because a CPU or GPU that doesn't overclock well is very boring and of zero value to me even if it is the most powerful option available for purchase. The fact that it will overclock at all will be an improvement over previous X3D chips since they were locked down. I'm not very optimistic but open-minded when it comes to AMD. I am not a brand-loyalist, but I do hold a grudge when I'm not happy about things turn out. Let's cross our fingers and hope they do something different and better that what Brother @Raiderman described about his experience with 9950X, which sounds remarkably similar to (maybe not as bad as) the new Core Ultra rubbish. I don't buy hardware on the basis of it being better for gaming and don't care too much about that.

Early adoption first-world problems galore... this guy is really taking a loss. But, it's still too expensive. He is selling it for what should have been no-discount retail. https://www.overclock.net/posts/29386568/

Big Cinebench numbers was why I jumped on the 5950X bandwagon and that was the only thing I found it was good for. It was worse at everything else, on top of being a buggy mess. It would be good for me to learn from my own mistakes and just do nothing right now. The systems I currently own are the best I have ever had. I need to remind myself of this and not allow passion to cloud good judgment.

Indeed. I'm going to be less tempted now as well. True. First it was the newest Ryzen not performing better in games than last gen, but being special because it used less power. The dust on that drama hadn't even settled before Intel showed up with their new dud CPUs. Now kind of the same issue (maybe a little bit worse) with Intel bringing less performance but using less power. But, that's good. Maybe the AMD, Intel and motherboard manufacturers will lose enough money that they pull their heads out and start paying closer attention. Using less power isn't a win. It could potentially be a side benefit, but it's not important in the grand scheme of things if the performance is not a jump in the right direction. Ironically, both Zen 5 and Core Ultra beat their last generation counterparts in Cinebench, but not much else.

I fear they (manufacturers) have figured out that the gamerboys of the world are generally about as smart as a box of rocks and all they need to do is offer something shiny and new and they'll jump on it as long as it has rainbow puke. Newer is always better newer.

That is really tragic, and it looks like Intel is headed down that same path now. Sad days for sure. The lowest common denominators ruin everything they touch. I guess it wasn't enough for the losers of the world to turn everything in the laptop world to dung. I guess it might turn out to be a good thing that I loaded up on extra LGA-1700 motherboards and CPUs. They may end up being worth more than I paid for them, LOL. In a very unsettling way it feels like it did with people holding onto obsolete Alienware and Clevo laptops because everything new was anemic, pathetic, unacceptable trash.

After being thoroughly disgusted with Core Ultra and disappointed that they even brought it to market, I loaded a 9950X and X870E Taichi into my shopping cart. The grand total is about $200 less than a 285K and Z890 Taichi. That initially piqued my interest. Then I spent a couple of hours on YouTube and OC.net and HWBOT.org seeing if there was any good reason to check out. I decided there wasn't. Nothing new is as good as what I already have that is not new. Either way, Red or Blue, it seems like I would be spending $1,000+ for something not better, which makes no sense. I hate how that feels. I think that is what the future holds in store for all of us regardless of what brand one prefers. What surprised me is how hard it was to find anything good to judge by online. Not many AMD overclockers out there other than a small group benching sub-zero. Most of the handfull that are benching Ryzen are using insanely overpriced ASUS ROG boards and I ain't going down that road, LOL. I was surprised that there are quite a few high end X870E motherboards without one single benchmark submission on HWBOT. And why is it that I can't find any 2-DIMM AM5 motherboards for sale other than lackluster ITX models? I thought the limited selection on the Intel side was bad, and it is bad, but it seems desirable 2-DIMM AM5 boards are essentially non-existent. Why? There are less than 600 benchmark submissions with 9950X and less than 3100 with 7950X. No ASRock submissions on X870 and less than 700 X670. There are like 10K submissions with 14th Gen i9 and like 18K 13th Gen i9 submissions. I don't understand this. With all of the poking around that I did on HWBOT, there was one very cool thing that I did discover though, and that was that you are truly exceptional, brother. Why are there so few Ryzen owners that are interested in overclocking? The oc.net AMD threads are also kind of subdued. I was surprised by this. I was literally about to punch the button to check out and changed my mind just like I did with the 285K and Z890 Taichi. This makes me feel very sad about what the future holds for us all. Things are not looking good overall. 😞 I think the same thing that is wrong with all of us. We all want to think the best and we are all more optimistic than we probably should be.

I agree and hope so because that's what we need and they deserve. The direction the pricing of things (tech and non-tech) is headed is not sustainable. Everything is grossly overpriced and most things are overvalued. The best thing that could happen in the tech realm is for most people and companies to just stop buying anything and use what they have as long as it continues to work and only buy used replacements for failed products that are deemed not repairable. Then they would have no money available to waste on idiotic nonsense like AI. Some companies would go out of business because their greed and pursuit of nonsense would no longer have sufficient funding. Que sera sera. Seems like a desperate act to move a product that isn't selling well. At that price they should include two 1TB or a 2TB. A 1TB NVMe or SSD it like nothing now. It is the smallest size I will buy. Anything less it just too small to bother with and I consider 1TB to be super-ordinary mainstream entry-level drive capacity.

I saw that, but the OCF is special order and not in stock at Provantage. It is a hard decision and it really shouldn't be. I think this is the only example of me ever having reservations and concerns about the idea of buying any flagship Intel CPU. I'm not there yet and do not know if or when, if ever, this would get me excited. The apprehension is significant. Not so much based on YouTube talking head nonsense as much as the reduced thread count, reduced overclocking capacity, high memory latency and unproven efficacy of their first stab at a glued together mess. AMD is just now starting to get their similar engineering mess figured out. It took a while and I still don't like it. Had they released these CPUs in an LGA-1700 form factor I probably would have rolled the dice on the new Core Ultra CPU design just for giggles. Having to buy a new motherboard to be part of their experiment makes it a harder pill to swallow.

Wow, sorry to hear that. Glad it did not damage anything else. If EVGA warranty service is still as wonderful as it has always been they will have you back in business pronto.

The 6900 XT that I had from @Rage Set and the Intel Arc A770 GPU that I sold and the current Z690 Velocita I own are all very solid ASRock products that offered good value for the money. It is a shame the Velocita has 4 memory slots. Had I not paid only $112 for it that would never have been acceptable. It sucks at memory overclocking because of that, but it does a nice job of everything else. I notice that Central Computer has 285K in stock, but available only for in-store pickup like Microcenter. They are priced correctly as well. A long way to drive from SoCal, but that is the only retailer I can see that has any. https://www.centralcomputer.com/intel-core-ultra-9-285k-processor-24-cores-32-threads-8-16-3-2ghz-base-clock-5-7ghz-turbo-125w-tdp.html @Talon got his from Provantage and it looks like they have 3 in stock. Looks like the only place a person can buy one online for delivery. https://www.provantage.com/intel-bx80768285k~7ITEP9HL.htm I have one in my cart and a Taichi OCF in my cart at NewEgg. I waited a few minutes and changed my mind and abandoned both carts. I remembered how disappointed and angry I was with the 5950X and Crosshair VIII experience and decided to procrastinate more before dropping $1200 on something I might regret.

l don't have one if you mean the Z890 Taichi OC Formula. I really want one, but I am not sure I want the CPU that goes with it, LOL. I kinda don't. But, the motherboard looks like it would be great to whatever degree that is possible looking at web pages. I really do like the BIOS layout on the Z690 Velocita. It doesn't really seem ASRock was aiming to impress anyone with a bunch of gamerboy aesthetics, but the menu layout is really intelligent and seems to be focused on function over form. I like how it looks and all of the buttons and useful switches on it. I like that the dual BIOS switch is on the rear I/O. And, obviously the fact that it is 2-DIMM eclipses everything else on my list of essential features. I only go with ASUS when the other options are suckier, and that looks like a worthy replacement for an Apex in many ways. I like the fact that it isn't made by ASUS. And, it is priced a whole lot better than an Apex. ASUS ROG products are always excessively overpriced. Thanks, guys. We grabbed lunch and a movie today after my appointment with the cardiologist. Nice time, but if you have a chance to see Absolution I'd recommend skipping it. Super boring, which is surprising considering Liam Neeson plays the main character. My wife and I were both having a very hard time staying awake because it was so dull.

It should be mandatory that all games include a free demo and built-in benchmark. Then I'd rarely ever buy games. A good number of games I have in my Steam, EA, Epic and Ubisoft libraries were acquired on sale for $25 or less only because they have a benchmark tool and I've never actually played them because they don't interest me in the least. When I do buy games, I always look to see if it is available from GOG first, then download the offline installers. DRM-free is the only way to fly. I love BF2042, but every time I play it having to temporarily re-enable DSE makes me angry. They need to keep their noses out of our business.

From what I understand, things are really funky now with the NPU and fabric crap but the E-core voltage is adjustable independently from the P-core voltage. The tiled nonsense sure does jack up the memory latency though. Very much like Ryzen in that respect, unfortunately. It is very intriguing while pretty disgusting at the same time. Microcenter get any 285K in stock yet? Seems like this happens every time. The part most in demand isn't available on launch day except in single-digit quantities with merchants, or not even at all. I am still tempted to buy a Taichi OCF. If I do (still not sure I will) it won't be until 285K is available. The Z890 platform looks great and I love a lot of things about that motherboard, but I am not very keen on Core Ultra so far. I don't really give a rat about gaming performance. The compute performance looks really good even though the memory latency looks pitiful compared to Raptor Lake. It is sad that Intel caved in and moved to a glued together mess like AMD. That monolithic design, even with the crappy E-cores, was one of the things that set them apart as superior. Now their part of the belly-buttons and buttholes club, doing what is popular instead of what is good, and stooping to partnering with TSMC. Today Mrs. Fox and I celebrate 38 years of marriage. Seems weird to even say that. Sometimes I forget that I am not 38 years old, LOL.

So, I had to step in and defend Mr. Potty-Mouth... LOL... https://www.overclock.net/posts/29385760/ I am not aware of any American sites that had any 285K stock that they could "sell out" because it was never in stock. Hardly anyone owns one. I guess if you have 10 and sell all 10 that qualifies as selling out, LOL. I am not sure if that is accurate about other places. It seems like the only group that have most of them are Asian countries. I only see a few rare and random scalper offerings on the 285K that are priced for idiots.

I don't really pay much attention to either of those guys. Most of their videos are clickbait and merely a platform for their expressions of personal bias and speculation. I don't have much respect for them anymore. Even when what they are saying is true, it's really slanted and framed in such a way as to stir up controversy. Stop and think of how many similarities there are between now and 30-45 days ago. Everyone hated Zen 5 because the focus was on using less power and not face-melting performance gains. Same game, new target. Who and what will be the next target? There always has to be drama. It seems to be essential.

This is probably accurate with respect to the Core Ultra line as a whole, but I don't see any market having 285K availability. Only the 285K really matters and it's not available for the most part. Most people in most places can't buy it even if they wanted it because nobody has any stock. If the extremely limited and nearly non-existent supply of 285K processors are only listed for purchase at inflated scalper prices it makes perfect sense that nobody is buying them. They shouldn't buy them and would be silly to do so. (The only 285K CPUs that I see for sale are few and far between, for asinine prices, and primarily from sketchy sellers that shouldn't be trusted.) I could see there being little or no interest in the lesser CPUs. If someone already owns a mid- or low-range CPU from 13th or 14th Gen there is no reason I can think of that they should want to spend money on something newer in the mid- or low-range. A month ago the media mantra was the same, except nobody wanted Zen 5. Now the popular story is nobody wants Core Ultra. This is becoming a pattern with the media. I would apply the same logic when the media was buzzing about Zen 5 sales being in the toilet. Only the flagship really matters to enthusiasts. And, gamers truly don't need any new hardware to game unless they own an antiquated system. A CPU and motherboard upgrade are too expensive and would yield little benefit to anyone if the pursuit is gaming. It irks me that system builders have stock and people can buy a prebuilt with the newest hardware, but the components are often not available in retail channels. This has been frequently true since the days of 8700K. That's messed up and I think it is indicative of inter-industry collusion.

Yes. Seems like a trend whenever next gen parts hit store shelves. Was an issue with most recent Intel, AMD and NVIDIA product launches. It is usually the flagship or halo SKU that is most affected. I think demand is never as massive as the media plays it to be, but low supply gives the impression of high demand and creates a feeling of success that may be exaggerated and more perception than reality. It does seem like supply is often an issue when TSMC is involved as well. Supply of low- and mid-range components (where poor silicon quality is less of a factor) is always better because they know the sheeple like cheap and they produce more of the cheap stuff for the zombie horde. If there was a 14th Gen CPU with 16 hyperthreaded P cores (32 thread) or a 15th Gen Z890 option that was equivalent P-cores (32 thread) and no tiled feces I would jump on either one in a heartbeat. Heck, I would even consider a monolithic 15th Gen with 32 E-cores and not even one P-core since the new E-cores overclock better than the crappy new Arrow Lake P-cores do. It is the hybrid/tiled/chiplet/fabric nonsense that sucks the most. Rubbish.

I think they don't have enough to sell is the primary issue. But, this isn't the first time we have seen this from Intel, AMD or NVIDIA. Being sold out isn't an accomplishment when supply is insufficient to meet demand, not to mention that is fosters scalping and overpricing. I think in this case they might have anticipated the decreased stock turbo clock speeds, poor overclocking and lower core/thread count and removal of hyperthreading would be poorly received by many and the poor availability could be a calculated and deliberate move to avoid having excessive stock sitting on store shelves. Since they have farmed out the chiplet/tiled abortion to TSMC they need to be even more careful that production doesn't outstrip demand and force them to lower prices or sell product at a loss.