Bidelloman
-
Posts
243 -
Joined
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by Bidelloman
-
had the bright idea to update my 2019 ltsc to 2021 version and lo and behold, sfxi audio, sound blaster atlas etc started working again...it's almost as if installing an OS that's older than the machine itself would give rise to some problems.. In my defense there was no ltsc 2021 at the time 😄
-
an unlocker much like dsanke's is enough for people to swap in a 3080 with a new heatsink and get the x170smg to work?
-
what's your average pch temp during loads? mine seems a bit high
-
that gpu power draw seems higher than stock, did you change anything?
-
the only thing that changed were the fans, and obviously exchanging the heatsinks to see which one was better. Thus the reduction in temps was due to fans and fans alone, By now I am pretty used to applying LM so I do not think there is much of a difference there. I changed the original post to something clearer
-
the truth is, I'm not sure these temps can apply to others just because of setup, using LM on both cpu and gpu etc, and the hybrid heatsink is meant to be run on water, though it can indeed run on air too, I never managed to get great temps on it on both sets of fans.
-
gpu on stock heatsink with new fans: 8/9 C less than the hybrid ( on air) and the previous stock one with stock fans (10 C less on hotspot). CPU stock heatsink new fans: pretty similar to be honest, some workloads can show a couple of degrees less, can happen to have a bit more stability on lower values, though I can say it doesn't go over 85/86 C on full tilt. Thing is I think there is a limit in thermal capacity that when reached increases temps on either cpu or gpu depending on load balance and heat concentration. I should mention that this is with a fan profile I have. Were I running max fans continuously, it would either take much longer to get to that level or simply be lower. Room temp was in both sets of tests 21 C. Gpu can't go over 0.975, frequency sits at 2085Mhz tops, small 350 overclock on memory, cpu is a 10600k with a 93 mv undervolt, frequencies are stock
-
Bought the new fans from taobao, they are excellent with the stock heatsink. Mostly I am so glad they are quieter. A good surprise is also the better temps they grant. I now have a set of stock fans, another stock heatsink and the hybrid heatsink, guess I should open a shop.
-
It usually keeps over 2000mhz. worst test feasible is of course the witcher on dx12 with ray tracing, constant 400watts and both cpu and gpu are quite stressed, gpu at 79 80 and cpu pretty similar
-
i get 2085 on 0.975, so no need for the shunt mod, just dumb luck I guess
-
true on the fan test, however one can still do a couple of runs of the same benchmarks with identical conditions on both sets of fans. Not saying you ought to since I know it is kinda bothersome to unscrew everything etc. looking forward to the wattage, 250 should be around the official tdp for the card iirc, however, that will be a mod for watercooled x170s only that's for sure.
-
what kind of realistic wattage is that gpu pulling now? is it safe for the caps, vrms etc ? would love some more tests, before and after for those fans too thank you
-
Clevo with Framework GPU interconnect standard?
Bidelloman replied to KabyZen's topic in Sager & Clevo
I would not mind having a dtr with a cpu as efficient as the 7800x3d, giving more headroom for the gpu, whether mxm or interconnect bga -
looking forward to noise / temps
-
Unlocker works for every version I tried for smg
-
I've had similar issues while doing cleanups and tests without removing the mystical clevo fan control ( and service) before opening it up and disassembling it, the bios went berserk because of xmp mostly. Did some gymnastics of using the first slot under the keyboard after having the bios reset before I could use the machine again. After that I could use all the slots with xmp without issues. For context I am also using the latest clevo bios, dsanke unlocked. Once I updated the bios and unlocked it, it ran fine without issues, maybe a reflash can help
-
2085, I also got a +350MHz on memory, perfect for daily use, never saw much over 2100 with the normal overclocked curve anyway
-
-
cheers, though I'll be honest, weirdly as this sounds I destroy those xmg ultra 17 scores, even with a 10600k, and I've seen prema machines do 13k on (iirc) timespy, but still, decently faster than the 2080s
-
Is there any comparison between rtx2080s mxm we got and the current best 4090* for laptops?
-
can't answer the no undervolt part, especially on cpus as relatively power hungry as these...not sure it'd be possible not to run into thermal throttle..however if you set it up to sustainable levels for daily use like I did, temps are gonna be more reliable than the stock heatsink. In my case ( 10600k) it takes an unlocked power level and 4.8Ghz or more to get over 90C, on auto fans by the way. The stock heatsink in my case was less constant and the gpu vapor chamber bent very easily..once I figured out the correct pad dimensions this new hybrid heatsink is better overall, both cpu and gpu. Worst case scenario I've seen with around 420W consumption, 76C on gpu and upper 80C on cpu, for hours and with a fan profile that wasn't pegged to the max. I was told there are new fans to be purchased by the same seller, however given their cost I'd like to first see tests if they are worth it. I should note I use Copper IHS, LM on both cpu and gpu..as far as I know it's the best that you can do without using the water loop. Portability is the same, had no issues moving it around and fitting it in its bag.
-
my 10600k is too, LM on both cpu and gpu, in fact using my usual setup, so slight overclock and undervolt on both cpu and gpu, I got 82 C on hottest cpu point and 67C on gpu..so as said perfectly in line with yours considering the differences
-
those temps with the system off are in line with mine, good to know, thanks a lot, also great water temps
-
I have used the same thicknesses as described here, it's a simple question of orientation of memory and vrm, but the 2 / 1.5 / original millimeters still apply. After some trial and error regarding longitudinal dimensions etc, contact is fine on gpu, cpu, memory etc. Just my fan profile needed tweaking
-
a different fan profile does indeed provide similar temps to yours, regardless of the differences, suppose I was expecting too much of these fans
