Jump to content
NotebookTalk

jaybee83

Member
  • Posts

    2,430
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    58

Everything posted by jaybee83

  1. aaaah, see, THATS the info i had in my head, 4090Ti double perf of a 3090 non-Ti ๐Ÿ™‚ heard it on MLID YT as for waiting for the 4090 Ti....hmmm thats a tough one. its release date will highly depend on what RDNA3 brings to the table. if AMD is daring to equal the 4090's performance right away and also catches up in RT performance, then Nvidia will not wait long to release the full fat AD102 die, maybe even right away together with the 4090. on the other hand, if the 4090 is safely holding the non-RT and RT perf crown then the green goblin can wait to maximize their profits (i.e. "mid cycle milking") AND have the winner halo product. in the former scenario, ill wait for the 4090 Ti, in the latter ill just grab the 4090 or 7900XT, letting me enjoy the hardware for a full year before anything else comes out. otherwise, id let that "wait forever for the next best thing" death cycle get a hold of me haha!
  2. there used to be 18.4 inch screen sizes available in "ye olden days" like in the Clevo P180HM: https://eurocom.com/ec/specs(223) that was back in the 600M GPU and 2000 Intel CPU days....socketed mobile cpus! ๐Ÿค 
  3. send them Vitaliy's report, see what MSI has to say to that ๐Ÿ˜› probably smth like: well u SURELY did something else to corrupt your RAM, aside from flashing our PERFECT INFALLIBLE BIOS! ๐Ÿ˜„
  4. only? i expected DOUBLE! ๐Ÿคช ha no chance ull be able to get that through the bottom part of the syringe, definitely need to manually spoon it into it from the top.
  5. only to a point. most people just go by hardware "names", i.e. = hey look! this 1kg slim laptop with 12 hours battery life has the same 3080 gpu in it as the 5kg DTR with only 1 hour battery life! SAME PERFORMANCE! ๐Ÿคช
  6. um...how do get display output? are u running on integrated graphics? in general, that entry in the bios doesnt really mean anything, as long as the card itself works ๐Ÿ™‚
  7. its always a question of how you spin it: u might as well build a whole ecosystem with repair shops and socketable hardware upgrades to support a platform for many years to come. that way you could argue that ur revenue per machine is much much higher than a single use disposable thin n light BGA turdbook.
  8. yep, of course, youre right, thats the big issue here: the sheeple want thin n light crap and the companies follow the big trends / go wherever demand takes them. thats how they make money. unfortunately, the group of people wanting big fat high performance DTRs becomes smaller and smaller each year...
  9. well...depends. cpus also need mobo based mosfets and depend on system ram. if you do the same for the gpu, i.e. provide the mosfets on the mobo and socketable vram....why not? ๐Ÿ˜
  10. ha, when i saw this thead i instantly thought to myself: I LIKE BOATS! (Jayztwocents) ๐Ÿ˜„ (now THATS an ad that works, i dont even play!)
  11. yehaw, keeping an eye on this thread! lurker mode activated ๐Ÿคช
  12. haha kool, keep a lookout on the marketplace here then ๐Ÿ˜‰
  13. yep, brilliant answer bud! the problem isnt that we would like to have ONLY DTRs, but that there is a lack of choice. we had BGA only thin n light crap in the olden days, as well. but nowadays its all there is on the market....no more choice ๐Ÿ˜
  14. Clevo FTW in this regard ๐Ÿ˜Ž
  15. man that guy sounds stressed.... ๐Ÿ˜…
  16. i was referring to a desktop cpu coupled with an MXM gpu. not a desktop chip on an mxm board ๐Ÿ˜„ although Khenglish has shown that even that is actually possible haha
  17. just throw a desktop cpu in the machine, couple it with a proper MXM card with beefy power delivery and dont define an interchangeable hardlock on cpu+gpu wattage. let both go as high as temps let you. voila, u got urself a real DTR that could easily use a 660W psu at the same dimensions of the previous 330W ๐Ÿ˜›๐Ÿ˜‰
  18. how about SteamOS or the newly released ChromeOS for any PC? that would totally suit ur machine im sure ๐Ÿคฃ
  19. haha yep, wasnt too serious about that suggestion anyways, ull likely have problems with signal integrity and power delivery if you stack them up like that.... but just based on sensibility, there SHOULD be an adapter going from 3042 directly to 2030 ๐Ÿค” have u checked on aliexpress / ebay?
  20. lets see if that stays that way after the previous experience haha. fingers crossed!
  21. well for now u definitely have the double adapter route *lol* 3042 to mpcie followed by mpcie to 2030 ๐Ÿ˜…
  22. in general, the continuous development of more efficient psus is definitely a good thing. i like seeing a new 330W model with smaller dimensions. BUT (and this is a biggens) the unfortunate reality is that the industry nowadays only tries to do less with more instead of MORE with more. so with a more efficient psu design u can either go smaller dimensions at same wattage OR higher wattage at same dimensions. weve got the former....but where is the latter? ๐Ÿคจ
  23. im getting the popcorn ready: ryan vs. Katja's gf in the fight of their lives haha
ร—
ร—
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Terms of Use